Literature DB >> 16291435

The minimum clinically significant difference in patient-assigned numeric scores for pain.

Dawn B Kendrick1, Tania D Strout.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimum clinically significant difference (MCSD) in patient-assigned, 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11) scores for pain and to determine if the MCSD varied with demographic characteristics.
METHODS: Eligible emergency department patients presenting with pain were asked to rate their pain on the NRS-11 every 20 minutes. Subjects compared pain intensity by choosing from the following verbal descriptor responses: "a lot more," "a little more," "about the same," "a little less," or "a lot less" pain. The MCSD was defined as the difference between scores rated "a little more" or "a little less" severe.
RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-four subjects were enrolled. The MCSD was 1.39 +/- 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.51). No statistically significant difference based on sex or pain etiology was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that a change of 1.39 +/- 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.51) on the NRS-11 is clinically significant when measuring pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16291435     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  32 in total

1.  Is Arthroscopic Bone Graft and Fixation for Scaphoid Nonunions Effective?

Authors:  Ho Jung Kang; Yong-Min Chun; Il Hyun Koh; Jae Han Park; Yun Rak Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Evaluation of the numeric rating scale for perception of effort during isometric elbow flexion exercise.

Authors:  Sofia Lampropoulou; Alexander V Nowicky
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison of diclofenac gel, ibuprofen gel, and ibuprofen gel with levomenthol for the topical treatment of pain associated with musculoskeletal injuries.

Authors:  Alan G Wade; Gordon M Crawford; David Young; Stephen Corson; Colin Brown
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Assessing patient pain scores in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kamarul Aryffin Baharuddin; Nasir Mohamad; Nik Hisamuddin Nik Abdul Rahman; Rashidi Ahmad; Nik Ahmad Shaiffudin Nik Him
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2010-01

5.  Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery.

Authors:  Christine E Foley; Erika Ryan; Jian Qun Huang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-06-22

6.  Estimating preference-based EQ-5D health state utilities or item responses from neuropathic pain scores.

Authors:  Ning Yan Gu; Chris Bell; Marc F Botteman; Xiang Ji; John A Carter; Ben van Hout
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Taking into account the observers' uncertainty: a graduated approach to the credibility of the patient's pain evaluation.

Authors:  Patrice Rusconi; Paolo Riva; Paolo Cherubini; Lorenzo Montali
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-11-07

Review 8.  Pain relief for the removal of femoral sheath in interventional cardiology adult patients.

Authors:  Cynthia J Wensley; Bridie Kent; Mike B McAleer; Sue M Price; Jim T Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

9.  Is Physician Empathy Associated With Differences in Pain and Functional Limitations After a Hand Surgeon Visit?

Authors:  Thomas J M Kootstra; Suzanne C Wilkens; Mariano E Menendez; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patient Satisfaction with Pain Level in Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Mary Golas; Chang Gi Park; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.