Literature DB >> 32572753

Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery.

Christine E Foley1,2,3, Erika Ryan4, Jian Qun Huang4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of decreasing insufflation pressure during robotic gynecologic surgery. The primary outcomes were patient-reported postoperative pain scores and length of stay. Secondary outcomes include surgical time, blood loss, and intraoperative respiratory parameters. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing robotic surgery for benign gynecologic conditions by a single minimally invasive surgeon at an academic hospital between 2014 and 2017. Patients were categorized by the maximum insufflation pressure reached during the surgery as either 15, 12, 10, or 8 mmHg. Continuous variables were compared using analysis of variance and χ2 test was used for categorical variables. 598 patients were included in this study with no differences in age, BMI, race, prior abdominal surgeries, or specimen weight between the four cohorts. When comparing cohorts, each decrease in insufflation pressure correlated with a significant decrease in initial pain scores (5.9 vs 5.4 vs 4.4 vs. 3.8, p ≤ 0.001), and hospital length of stay (449 vs 467 vs 351 vs. 317 min, p ≤ 0.001). There were no differences in duration of surgery (p = 0.31) or blood loss (p = 0.09). Lower operating pressures were correlated with significantly lower peak inspiratory pressures (p < 0.001) and tidal volumes (p < 0.001). Surgery performed at lower-pressure pneumoperitoneum (≤ 10 mmHg) is associated with lower postoperative pain scores, shorter length of stay, and improved intraoperative respiratory parameters without increased duration of surgery or blood loss. Operating at lower insufflation pressures is a low-cost, reversible intervention that should be implemented during robotic surgery as it results in the improved pain scores and shorter hospital stays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERAS; Laparoscopy; Pneumoperitoneum; Postoperative pain; Robotic surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32572753     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01104-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  32 in total

1.  Platinum desensitization in patients with carboplatin hypersensitivity: A single-institution retrospective study.

Authors:  Gary Altwerger; Gregory M Gressel; Diana P English; Wendelin K Nelson; Nina Carusillo; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Alessandro Santin; Peter E Schwartz; Elena S Ratner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Results of introducing a rapid recovery program for total abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dickson; Peter A Argenta; John A Reichert
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Decreasing postoperative narcotics in reconstructive pelvic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Krista M L Reagan; David M O'Sullivan; Richard Gannon; Adam C Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Andreas Obermair; Monika Janda; Jannah Baker; Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan; Alison Brand; Russell Hogg; Thomas W Jobling; Russell Land; Tom Manolitsas; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L Nicklin; Martin K Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Peter Sykes; Hextan Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Karfai Tam; Karen Chan; David H Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Gregory Robertson; Graeme Walker; Anthony McCartney; Val Gebski
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis of the obturator nerve: a case report.

Authors:  Geraldine Ekpo; Sangeeta Senapati; Arnold P Advincula
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Enhanced Recovery Implementation in Major Gynecologic Surgeries: Effect of Care Standardization.

Authors:  Susan C Modesitt; Bethany M Sarosiek; Elisa R Trowbridge; Dana L Redick; Puja M Shah; Robert H Thiele; Mohamed Tiouririne; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.

Authors:  Martin A Martino; Elizabeth A Berger; Jeffrey T McFetridge; Jocelyn Shubella; Gabrielle Gosciniak; Taylor Wejkszner; Gregory F Kainz; Jeremy Patriarco; M Bijoy Thomas; Richard Boulay
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Jenna R Zechmeister; Tarah L Pua; Leslie R Boyd; Stephanie V Blank; John P Curtin; Bhavana Pothuri
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Acupuncture versus venlafaxine for the management of vasomotor symptoms in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eleanor M Walker; Alba I Rodriguez; Beth Kohn; Ronald M Ball; Jan Pegg; Jeffrey R Pocock; Ramon Nunez; Ed Peterson; Susan Jakary; Robert A Levine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The "Dark Side" of Pneumoperitoneum and Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Giuseppina Rosaria Umano; Giulia Delehaye; Carmine Noviello; Alfonso Papparella
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-05-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.