Literature DB >> 21769733

Evaluation of the numeric rating scale for perception of effort during isometric elbow flexion exercise.

Sofia Lampropoulou1, Alexander V Nowicky.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the reliability and validity of the numerical rating scale (0-10 NRS) for rating perception of effort during isometric elbow flexion in healthy people. 33 individuals (32 ± 8 years) participated in the study. Three re-test measurements within one session and three weekly sessions were undertaken to determine the reliability of the scale. The sensitivity of the scale following 10 min isometric fatiguing exercise of the elbow flexors as well as the correlation of the effort with the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the flexor muscles were tested. Perception of effort was tested during isometric elbow flexion at 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% MVC. The 0-10 NRS demonstrated an excellent test-retest reliability [intra class correlation (ICC) = 0.99 between measurements taken within a session and 0.96 between 3 consecutive weekly sessions]. Exploratory curve fitting for the relationship between effort ratings and voluntary force, and underlying EMG showed that both are best described by power functions (y = ax ( b )). There were also strong correlations (range 0.89-0.95) between effort ratings and EMG recordings of all flexor muscles supporting the concurrent criterion validity of the measure. The 0-10 NRS was sensitive enough to detect changes in the perceived effort following fatigue and significantly increased at the level of voluntary contraction used in its assessment (p < 0.001). These findings suggest the 0-10 NRS is a valid and reliable scale for rating perception of effort in healthy individuals. Future research should seek to establish the validity of the 0-10 NRS in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21769733     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2074-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  32 in total

1.  Standardized scaling procedures for rating perceived exertion during resistance exercise.

Authors:  R E Gearhart; F L Goss; K M Lagally; J M Jakicic; J Gallagher; R J Robertson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Examining test-retest reliability: an intra-class correlation approach.

Authors:  Miaofen Yen; Li-Hua Lo
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Quadriceps activation and perceived exertion during a high intensity, steady state contraction to failure.

Authors:  D M Pincivero; W S Gear
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise.

Authors:  S Grant; T Aitchison; E Henderson; J Christie; S Zare; J McMurray; H Dargie
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?

Authors:  Craig T Hartrick; Juliann P Kovan; Sharon Shapiro
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Sense of effort during a fatiguing exercise protocol in chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Karen E Wallman; Paul Sacco
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 4.674

7.  Effect of exercise intensity on differentiated and undifferentiated ratings of perceived exertion during cycle and treadmill exercise in recreationally active and trained women.

Authors:  Melinda R Bolgar; Carol E Baker; Fredric L Goss; Elizabeth Nagle; Robert J Robertson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data.

Authors:  E K Breivik; G A Björnsson; E Skovlund
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 9.  Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue.

Authors:  S C Gandevia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  Central fatigue after cycling evaluated using peripheral magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Ian J Kremenic; Beth W Glace; S Simon Ben-Avi; Stephen J Nicholas; Malachy P McHugh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Rating of Perceived Effort: Methodological Concerns and Future Directions.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Aviv Emanuel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Perception of effort during an isometric contraction is influenced by prior muscle lengthening or shortening.

Authors:  Benjamin Kozlowski; Benjamin Pageaux; Emma F Hubbard; Benjamin St Peters; Philip J Millar; Geoffrey A Power
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The relationship of femoral neck shaft angle and adiposity to greater trochanteric pain syndrome in women. A case control morphology and anthropometric study.

Authors:  Am Fearon; S Stephens; Jl Cook; Pn Smith; T Neeman; W Cormick; Jm Scarvell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Convergent Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Exercise in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  John W D Lea; Jamie M O'Driscoll; Sabina Hulbert; James Scales; Jonathan D Wiles
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-08

5.  Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong version of Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee underwent joint replacement surgery: cross-cultural and sub-cultural adaptation, and validation.

Authors:  Kevin Ki-Wai Ho; Wai-Wang Chau; Lawrence Chun-Man Lau; Michael Tim-Yun Ong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Kinetic changes in sweat lactate following fatigue during constant workload exercise.

Authors:  Hiroki Okawara; Tomonori Sawada; Daisuke Nakashima; Yuta Maeda; Shunsuke Minoji; Takashi Morisue; Yoshinori Katsumata; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-01

7.  Rehabilitation Goals and Effects of Goal Achievement on Outcome Following an Adapted Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitation Intervention.

Authors:  Line Preede; Helene L Soberg; Håkon Dalen; Astrid Nyquist; Reidun Jahnsen; Martin Saebu; Erik Bautz-Holter; Cecilie Røe
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.