Literature DB >> 19898929

Taking into account the observers' uncertainty: a graduated approach to the credibility of the patient's pain evaluation.

Patrice Rusconi1, Paolo Riva, Paolo Cherubini, Lorenzo Montali.   

Abstract

This article presents two experiments aiming to investigate the adoption of a graduated measure to describe credibility attribution by observers who evaluate patients' pain accounts. A total of 160 medical students were required to express a credibility judgment on the pain intensity level of hypothetical patients. We used 16 vignettes based on a factorial mixed-design. Within-participants factors were the reported pain, the presence of a physical sign, the patient's facial expression and the patient's gender, and between-groups factors were the patient's age and the geographical distribution of the patient's name. Results confirm the well-established tendency not to believe patients' self-reports and provide information regarding the evaluators' uncertainty. The findings suggest that a graduated measure is useful for assessing the degree of uncertainty of the observers and subtle effects of different factors upon the judgment of patient's pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19898929     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-009-9232-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  33 in total

1.  The prevalence and perception of pain amongst hospital in-patients.

Authors:  P Yates; A Dewar; H Edwards; B Fentiman; J Najman; R Nash; V Richardson; J Fraser
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.036

2.  Genuine, suppressed and faked facial behavior during exacerbation of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Kenneth D Craig; Susan A Hyde; Christopher J Patrick
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Do you believe I'm in pain? Nurses' assessment of patients' pain.

Authors:  A Jacques
Journal:  Prof Nurse       Date:  1992-01

4.  Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration.

Authors:  Laetitia Marquié; Eric Raufaste; Dominique Lauque; Claudette Mariné; Marie Ecoiffier; Paul Sorum
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Improving subjective scaling of pain using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Konrad Pesudovs; Bruce A Noble
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Ethnic differences in pain tolerance: clinical implications in a chronic pain population.

Authors:  R R Edwards; D M Doleys; R B Fillingim; D Lowery
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Nurses' personal opinions about patients' pain and their effect on recorded assessments and titration of opioid doses.

Authors:  M McCaffery; B R Ferrell; C Pasero
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.929

8.  Why pain assessment must start with believing the patient.

Authors:  M Waterhouse
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1996 Sep 18-23

9.  Accuracy of emergency nurses in assessment of patients' pain.

Authors:  Kathleen Puntillo; Martha Neighbor; Nel O'Neil; Ramona Nixon
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 10.  Congruence between health professionals' and patients' pain ratings: a review of the literature.

Authors:  P Solomon
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2001
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.