Literature DB >> 16286615

Clinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetry.

Christoph Kniestedt1, Shan Lin, Joyce Choe, Alan Bostrom, Michelle Nee, Robert L Stamper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare intraocular pressure readings of recently introduced dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with pneumatonometry (PTG) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and to correlate central corneal thickness (CCT) with these readings.
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional observation and instrument validation study. We included 258 independent eyes with normal anterior segment examinations results, irrespective of glaucoma diagnosis or glaucoma suspect. After pachymetry, DCT, PTG, and GAT were performed in a randomized order. Intraocular pressures as measured by DCT, PTG, and GAT were compared with each other and with CCT.
RESULTS: Eyes with thinner CCTs tended to yield lower intraocular pressure measurements by GAT. A significant correlation (Pearson product moment correlation, P<.001) between CCT and GAT was found with a regression of 0.25 mm Hg per 10 microm (R2 = 0.060). Variation of CCT had no significant effect on intraocular pressure measurements by PTG (P = .10; R2 = 0.01) and DCT (P = .80; R2<0.01). A piecewise regression model showed that GAT readings are not linearly correlated with CCT. Comparison of the slopes below and above 535 microm showed the highest significance (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Goldmann applanation tonometry readings are potentially influenced by CCT, whereas PTG and DCT seem to be less dependent on CCT. Correlation between CCT and GAT is not linear. A simple correction formula suggesting a linear relationship might not be correct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16286615     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.123.11.1532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  22 in total

Review 1.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Influence of residual corneal bed thickness after myopic LASIK on intraocular pressure measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  L Muller; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Tetsuya Morita; Nobuyuki Shoji; Kazutaka Kamiya; Mana Hagishima; Fusako Fujimura; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Yoshiro Mawatari; Akira Kobayashi; Hideaki Yokogawa; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  [Evaluation of correction formulas for tonometry : The Goldmann applanation tonometry in approximation to dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  J Wachtl; M Töteberg-Harms; S Frimmel; C Kniestedt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Josephine Wachtl; Marc Töteberg-Harms; Sonja Frimmel; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  [Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus].

Authors:  N Schädle; J D Unterlauft; T Klink; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  J Jimenez-Roman; F Gil-Carrasco; A Martinez; O Albis-Donado; J D De la Torre-Tovar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed.

Authors:  Ying Hong; Nobuyuki Shoji; Tetsuya Morita; Kazunori Hirasawa; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Masayuki Kasahara; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Tony Realini; Robert N Weinreb; Gerald Hobbs
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.