Literature DB >> 16285334

Impact of the informed consent process on patients' understanding of varicose veins and their treatment.

M F Dillon1, C J Carr, T M F Feeley, S Tierney.   

Abstract

AIM: It is particularly important that patients have reasonable understanding of the risks, benefits and nature of elective surgery. This study sought to analyse this level of understanding in patients undergoing varicose vein surgery
METHODS: Eighty two patients completed a questionnaire in the vascular outpatient clinic and were asked to complete a telephone questionnaire following the clinic.
RESULTS: Pain (n = 46) was the primary reason patients considered varicose vein surgery followed by appearance (n = 32). Most patients felt that varicose veins placed them at high risk of leg ulcers (n = 46) and DVT (n = 41). A high level of expectation that surgery would significantly affect pain and flares was recorded. While the outpatient visit did not materially change these misconceptions, an educational leaflet significantly enhanced the recall of complications (p = 0.028) in patients who remembered receiving a leaflet.
CONCLUSION: Patients attending varicose vein clinics have an unrealistic expectation of the benefits of surgery and fail to understand the benign nature of their condition. The outpatient process has little effect on patient-held beliefs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16285334     DOI: 10.1007/bf03169143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  9 in total

1.  The addition of an audiocassette recording of a consultation to written recommendations for patients with advanced cancer: A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  E Bruera; E Pituskin; K Calder; C M Neumann; J Hanson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  What are the symptoms of varicose veins? Edinburgh vein study cross sectional population survey.

Authors:  A Bradbury; C Evans; P Allan; A Lee; C V Ruckley; F G Fowkes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-06

3.  Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty.

Authors:  Y Godwin
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2000-03

4.  Informed consent -- why are its goals imperfectly realized?

Authors:  B R Cassileth; R V Zupkis; K Sutton-Smith; V March
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets.

Authors:  A B Zion; J Aiman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Informed consent: is it a myth?

Authors:  D A Herz; J E Looman; S K Lewis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Satisfying patients' needs for surgical information.

Authors:  M H Edwards
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  What patients recall of the preoperative discussion after retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  I A Priluck; D M Robertson; H Buettner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Patients' recall of clinical information following laparoscopy for acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  S M Murphy; M Donnelly; T Fitzgerald; W A Tanner; F B V Keane; S Tierney
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.939

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.