Literature DB >> 443331

What patients recall of the preoperative discussion after retinal detachment surgery.

I A Priluck, D M Robertson, H Buettner.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective study to determine the percentage of preoperative information that was retained by 100 patients undergoing a scleral buckling procedure. Each patient received a standardized preoperative discussion regarding the nature of retinal detachment and its management. During the immediate postoperative period, each patient was questioned about the informed consent discussion. Although 97% of the patients acknowledged a thorough preoperative discussion there was a definite disparity between the patients' concept of adequate physician disclosure and the actual retention of the preoperative explanation. Overall retention of preoperative disclosure based on correct answers to 12 questions was only 57%. Few patients, 23%, retained knowledge of surgical risks, and only 61% remembered that a foreign material would be permanently sutured to the eye. When a patient failed to remember the correct answer to a question, more than half of the time he or she denied that information relevant to the question had been discussed. The results of this study indicate that patients retain primarily information that seems to be in favor of their decision to have surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 443331     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90292-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  13 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative patient education for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Beth Aviva Preminger; Valerie Lemaine; Isabel Sulimanoff; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Effects of presentation method on the understanding of informed consent.

Authors:  T H Moseley; M N Wiggins; P O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Medical ethics and the two dogmas of liberalism.

Authors:  T F Ackerman
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1984-02

4.  Informed consent for sacrocolpopexy: is counseling effective in achieving patient comprehension?

Authors:  Sonia Ranganath Adams; Michele R Hacker; Anna Merport Modest; Peter L Rosenblatt; Eman A Elkadry
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  Impact of the informed consent process on patients' understanding of varicose veins and their treatment.

Authors:  M F Dillon; C J Carr; T M F Feeley; S Tierney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  [On informed patient consent].

Authors:  M C Kayser; Y von Harder; B Friemert; M A Scherer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Children's understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research.

Authors:  T M Burke; R Abramovitch; S Zlotkin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Assessing the quality of consent in elective hip and knee arthroplasty: Do modern orthopaedic surgeons make the cut?

Authors:  Joseph Heylen; Vaki Antoniou; Jayson Roberts; Oliver Kemp; James Morris; Amit Vats
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 9.  The parameters of informed consent.

Authors:  Edward L Raab
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

10.  Postoperative laparoscopic bariatric surgery patients do not remember potential complications.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; David S Tichansky; Raymond J Taddeucci
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.