Literature DB >> 2586962

Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets.

A B Zion1, J Aiman.   

Abstract

Written educational and informational materials are an important and potentially useful means to complement verbal instructions, assure that consent for tests and procedures is informed, and enhance compliance with treatment. In specialties other than obstetrics and gynecology, many of these materials have been found to be written at a level of difficulty above the reading ability of the intended audience. The SMOG formula was used to assess the level of reading difficulty of all 74 English-language patient education pamphlets developed by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Patient Education. Sixty-one of these pamphlets are written at a reading difficulty level of 11th grade or higher. Although the mean reading education level in the United States is at grade 12.6, the mean literacy level is at or below eighth grade. With the exception of one ACOG pamphlet written specifically for low-readability audiences (p-063, Birth Control Pills), all the pamphlets are written at a level higher than the literacy level of many women. The information is unlikely to be understood if it is written above the reading ability of the intended audience. This disparity is accentuated for health-education materials because scientific and technical terms further reduce the level of comprehension. The SMOG formula is a simple means to ensure that educational materials are written at a level appropriate for the intended audience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2586962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  The impact of an educational pamphlet on knowledge and anxiety in women with preeclampsia.

Authors:  Nadine Sauvé; Raymond O Powrie; Lucia Larson; Maureen G Phipps; Sherry Weitzen; Donna Fitzpatrick; Karen Rosene-Montella
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2008-09-01

2.  Materials and strategies that work in low literacy health communication.

Authors:  S Plimpton; J Root
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Impact of the informed consent process on patients' understanding of varicose veins and their treatment.

Authors:  M F Dillon; C J Carr; T M F Feeley; S Tierney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Development and Formative Assessment of the Hearing Loss Toolkit for Self-Management.

Authors:  Michelle L Arnold; Preyanca Oree; Victoria Sanchez; Nicholas Reed; Theresa Chisolm
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2019-02-05

5.  Exploring clinicians' attitudes about using aspirin for risk reduction in people with Lynch Syndrome with no personal diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanni Chen; Michelle Peate; Rajneesh Kaur; Bettina Meiser; Tim Wong; Judy Kirk; Robyn L Ward; Annabel Goodwin; Finlay Macrae; Janet Hiller; Alison H Trainer; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  Written information about individual medicines for consumers.

Authors:  Donald Nicolson; Peter Knapp; D K Theo Raynor; Pat Spoor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

7.  Health Literacy and Associated Outcomes in the Postpartum Period at Grady Memorial Hospital.

Authors:  Jade D Stafford; Emily R Goggins; Eva Lathrop; Lisa B Haddad
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-16

8.  Relationship between health literacy, health status, and healthy behaviors among older adults in Isfahan, Iran.

Authors:  Seyed Homamodin Javadzade; Gholamreza Sharifirad; Fatemeh Radjati; Firoozeh Mostafavi; Mahnoosh Reisi; Akbar Hasanzade
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2012-08-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.