Literature DB >> 1628015

Gonad protection in young orthopaedic patients.

N Kenny1, J Hill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gonad shields are correctly positioned on the pelvic radiographs of children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
DESIGN: Retrospective study of radiographs taken of children treated by in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis between 1 January 1983 and 31 December 1988.
SETTING: Three teaching hospitals in north west England. PATIENTS: 32 patients with complete set of radiographs.
RESULTS: An average of 10.8 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs plus 8.9 lateral hip radiographs had been performed per patient. Gonad shields had been completely omitted in 137 (40%) anteroposterior pelvic radiographs performed on the 32 patients at the time of completion of the study. In 100 (29%) the gonad shields were adequately protecting the gonads, but in 109 (31%) the gonad shields were not protecting the gonads due to incorrect positioning of the shield. The incorrect positioning of the gonad shields was more commonly found in girls than boys (64 vs 45; p less than 0.012), presumably because of the difficulty in determining gonadal position in relation to surface landmarks. Absence of gonad shields was also more commonly seen in girls (82 v 55; p less than 0.005), but this is not easily explained.
CONCLUSIONS: Gonad shields are not protecting the gonads in a large percentage of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs (71%) because they have been omitted or inadequately placed. This avoidable excess radiation exposure to the gonads, combined with the inability to shield the gonads in lateral hip radiographs and the large number of radiographs performed, results in the gonads receiving a higher dose of radiation than may otherwise be the case, and may increase the potential for disease in the future offspring of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1628015      PMCID: PMC1882157          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6839.1411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  4 in total

1.  Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria.

Authors:  M J Gardner; M P Snee; A J Hall; C A Powell; S Downes; J D Terrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-17

Review 2.  Past and revised risk estimates for cancer induced by irradiation and their influence on dose limits.

Authors:  R B Richardson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Assessment of the current use of rare-earth screens in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J G Russell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Parental occupations of children with leukaemia in west Cumbria, north Humberside, and Gateshead.

Authors:  P A McKinney; F E Alexander; R A Cartwright; L Parker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-23
  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Shielding reproductive organs of orthopaedic patients during pelvic radiography.

Authors:  A M Wainwright
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Gonad protection in young orthopaedic patients.

Authors:  A D Tasker; D J Wilson; J C MacLarnon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-04

3.  Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks.

Authors:  Summer L Kaplan; Dennise Magill; Marc A Felice; Rui Xiao; Sayed Ali; Xiaowei Zhu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-10-18

4.  More harm than good? The anatomy of misguided shielding of the ovaries.

Authors:  S L Fawcett; A C Gomez; S J Barter; M Ditchfield; P Set
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Low-dose biplanar radiography can be used in children and adolescents to accurately assess femoral and tibial torsion and greatly reduce irradiation.

Authors:  Olivier Meyrignac; Ramiro Moreno; Christiane Baunin; Julie Vial; Franck Accadbled; Agnes Sommet; Jérome Sales de Gauzy; Nicolas Sans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads?

Authors:  Matthew Winfeld; Naomi Strubel; Lynne Pinkney; Shailee Lala; Sarah Milla; James Babb; Nancy Fefferman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02

7.  Gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography: disadvantages prevail over benefit.

Authors:  Marij J Frantzen; Simon Robben; Alida A Postma; Johannes Zoetelief; Joachim E Wildberger; Gerrit J Kemerink
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-09-25

8.  Radiation dose reduction at a price: the effectiveness of a male gonadal shield during helical CT scans.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Kevin A Casciotta; Yusuf E Erdi; Lawrence N Rothenberg
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Gonadal shield: is it the Albatross hanging around the neck of developmental dysplasia of the hip research?

Authors:  A Kumar; W W Chau; A L-H Hung; J K-T Wong; B K W Ng; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.