PURPOSE: To evaluate in children the agreement between femoral and tibial torsion measurements obtained with low-dose biplanar radiography (LDBR) and CT, and to study dose reduction ratio between these two techniques both in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty children with lower limb torsion abnormalities were included in a prospective study. Biplanar radiographs and CTs were performed for measurements of lower limb torsion on each patient. Values were compared using Bland-Altman plots. Interreader and intrareader agreements were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients. Comparative dosimetric study was performed using an ionization chamber in a tissue-equivalent phantom, and with thermoluminescent dosimeters in 5 patients. RESULTS: Average differences between CT and LDBR measurements were -0.1° ±1.1 for femoral torsion and -0.7° ±1.4 for tibial torsion. Interreader agreement for LDBR measurements was very good for both femoral torsion (FT) (0.81) and tibial torsion (TT) (0.87). Intrareader agreement was excellent for FT (0.97) and TT (0.89). The ratio between CT scan dose and LDBR dose was 22 in vitro (absorbed dose) and 32 in vivo (skin dose). CONCLUSION: Lower limb torsion measurements obtained with LDBR are comparable to CT measurements in children and adolescents, with a considerably reduced radiation dose. KEY POINTS: • LDBR and CT lower-limb torsion measurements are comparable in children and adolescents. • LDBR considerably reduced radiation dose necessary for lower-limb torsion measurements. • LDBR can be used for evaluation of lower limb-torsion in orthopaediatric patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate in children the agreement between femoral and tibial torsion measurements obtained with low-dose biplanar radiography (LDBR) and CT, and to study dose reduction ratio between these two techniques both in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty children with lower limb torsion abnormalities were included in a prospective study. Biplanar radiographs and CTs were performed for measurements of lower limb torsion on each patient. Values were compared using Bland-Altman plots. Interreader and intrareader agreements were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients. Comparative dosimetric study was performed using an ionization chamber in a tissue-equivalent phantom, and with thermoluminescent dosimeters in 5 patients. RESULTS: Average differences between CT and LDBR measurements were -0.1° ±1.1 for femoral torsion and -0.7° ±1.4 for tibial torsion. Interreader agreement for LDBR measurements was very good for both femoral torsion (FT) (0.81) and tibial torsion (TT) (0.87). Intrareader agreement was excellent for FT (0.97) and TT (0.89). The ratio between CT scan dose and LDBR dose was 22 in vitro (absorbed dose) and 32 in vivo (skin dose). CONCLUSION: Lower limb torsion measurements obtained with LDBR are comparable to CT measurements in children and adolescents, with a considerably reduced radiation dose. KEY POINTS: • LDBR and CT lower-limb torsion measurements are comparable in children and adolescents. • LDBR considerably reduced radiation dose necessary for lower-limb torsion measurements. • LDBR can be used for evaluation of lower limb-torsion in orthopaediatric patients.
Authors: Andrea B Rosskopf; Leonhard E Ramseier; Reto Sutter; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian M Buck Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-05-21
Authors: Marco Branchini; Antonella Del Vecchio; Carmen Rosaria Gigliotti; Alessandro Loria; Alberto Zerbi; Riccardo Calandrino Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Steve C N Hui; Jean-Philippe Pialasse; Judy Y H Wong; Tsz-Ping Lam; Bobby K W Ng; Jack C Y Cheng; Winnie C W Chu Journal: Scoliosis Spinal Disord Date: 2016-12-29
Authors: Stephan Waelti; Tim Fischer; Jennifer Griessinger; Johannes Cip; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Michael Ditchfield; Thomas Allmendinger; Michael Messerli; Stefan Markart Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2022-07-15
Authors: Peter Kaiser; René Attal; Mark Kammerer; Michael Thauerer; Lea Hamberger; Raul Mayr; Werner Schmoelz Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.067