Literature DB >> 16279755

Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: a systematic review.

Bonnie E Glaser1, Lisa A Bero.   

Abstract

Involvement of industry in academic research is widespread and associated with favorable outcomes for industry. The objective of this study was to review empirical data on the attitudes of researchers toward industry involvement and financial ties in research. A review of the literature for quantitative data from surveys on the attitudes of researchers to financial ties in research, reported in English, resulted in the 17 studies included. Review of these studies revealed that investigators are concerned about the impact of financial ties on choice of research topic, research conduct and publication, but this concern is less among investigators already involved with industry. Researchers approve of industry collaboration and financial ties when the ties are indirectly related to the research, disclosure is upfront, and results and ideas are freely publicized. However, their trust in disclosure as a way to manage conflicts may reveal a lack of awareness of the actual impact of financial incentives on themselves and other researchers.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16279755     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-005-0026-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  39 in total

1.  Bias and causal associations in observational research.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Declaration of financial interests.

Authors:  P Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Expanding disclosure of conflicts of interest: the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Baruch A Brody; Cheryl Anderson; S Van McCrary; Laurence McCullough; Robert Morgan; Nelda Wray
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

5.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Authors:  S H Downs; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Influences on the quality of published drug studies.

Authors:  L A Bero; D Rennie
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Survey of ethical issues in dental research.

Authors:  M J Bebeau; E L Davis
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 8.  Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say?

Authors:  J Lexchin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature.

Authors:  M K Cho; L A Bero
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Looking a gift horse in the mouth: corporate gifts supporting life sciences research.

Authors:  E G Campbell; K S Louis; D Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  19 in total

1.  The complexity of competing and conflicting interests.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird; Raymond E Spier
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Annette Flanagin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: an analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Boyd; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  A conflict of interest disclosure policy for science and engineering ethics.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird; Raymond E Spier
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Researcher views about funding sources and conflicts of interest in nanotechnology.

Authors:  Katherine A McComas
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alice Fabbri; Alexandra Lai; Quinn Grundy; Lisa Anne Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Academic conflict of interest.

Authors:  Djillali Annane; Nicolas Lerolle; Sylvain Meuris; Jean Sibilla; Keith M Olsen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Researcher Perspectives on Conflicts of Interest: A Qualitative Analysis of Views from Academia.

Authors:  Jensen T Mecca; Carter Gibson; Vincent Giorgini; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Christopher T Robertson; Jessica A Myers; Susannah L Rose; Victoria Gillet; Kathryn M Ross; Robert J Glynn; Steven Joffe; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Medical students' exposure to and attitudes about the pharmaceutical industry: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsten E Austad; Jerry Avorn; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.