Literature DB >> 17717729

A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines.

Jessica S Ancker1, Annette Flanagin.   

Abstract

Scientific journals can promote ethical publication practices through policies on conflicts of interest. However, the prevalence of conflict of interest policies and the definition of conflict of interest appear to vary across scientific disciplines. This survey of high-impact, peer-reviewed journals in 12 different scientific disciplines was conducted to assess these variations. The survey identified published conflict of interest policies in 28 of 84 journals (33%). However, when representatives of 49 of the 84 journals (58%) completed a Web-based survey about journal conflict of interest policies, 39 (80%) reported having such a policy. Frequency of policies (including those not published) varied by discipline, from 100% among general medical journals to none among physics journals. Financial interests were most frequently addressed with relation to authors; policies for reviewers most often addressed non-financial conflicts. Twenty-two of the 39 journals with policies (56%) had policies about editors' conflicts. The highest impact journals in each category were most likely to have a published policy, and the frequency of policies fell linearly with rank; for example, policies were published by 58% of journals ranked 1 in their category, 42% of journals ranked third, and 8% of journals ranked seventh (test for trend, p = 0.003). Having a conflict of interest policy was also associated with a self-reported history of problems with conflict of interest. The prevalence of published conflict of interest policies was higher than that reported in a 1997 study, an increase that might be attributable to heightened awareness of conflict of interest issues. However, many of the journals with policies do not make them readily available and many of those policies that were available lacked clear definitions of conflict of interest or details about how disclosures would be managed during peer review and publication.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717729     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9011-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  15 in total

1.  Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry: A case study.

Authors:  E A Boyd; L A Bero
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Journal policies on conflict of interest: if this is the therapy, what's the disease?

Authors:  S Krimsky
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  Conflict of interest in psychopharmacology: can Dr. Jekyll still control Mr. Hyde?

Authors:  Giovanni A Fava
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 17.659

4.  Conflicts around a study of Mexican crops.

Authors:  Kenneth Worthy; Richard C Strohman; Paul R Billings
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Industry scientists look for benefits, not risks.

Authors:  Maria J Hötzel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bonnie E Glaser; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Beyond conflict of interest. Transparency is the key.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-01

9.  Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists.

Authors:  H T Stelfox; G Chua; K O'Rourke; A S Detsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Thyroid storm.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  29 in total

1.  Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Journals.

Authors:  F Alfonso; A Timmis; F J Pinto; G Ambrosio; H Ector; P Kulakowski; P Vardas
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  The need for a transparent, ethical, and successful relationship between academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry: a view of the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science (GREES).

Authors:  O Bruyere; J A Kanis; M-E Ibar-Abadie; N Alsayed; M L Brandi; N Burlet; D L Cahall; A Chines; J-P Devogelaer; W Dere; N Goel; N Hughes; J-M Kaufman; S Korte; B H Mitlak; D Niese; R Rizzoli; L C Rovati; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure Policies of Environmental, Occupational, and Public Health Journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Brandon Konecny; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Transparent texts: authors of scientific articles often have conflicts of interest. It is important for these to be communicated transparently to the readers.

Authors:  Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Researcher views about funding sources and conflicts of interest in nanotechnology.

Authors:  Katherine A McComas
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Addressing ethical considerations and authors' conflict of interest disclosure in medical journals in Iran.

Authors:  Akram Heidari; Seyyed Hassan Adeli; Shiva Mehravaran; Fariba Asghari
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 1.352

7.  The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.

Authors:  Nathalie Percie du Sert; Viki Hurst; Amrita Ahluwalia; Sabina Alam; Marc T Avey; Monya Baker; William J Browne; Alejandra Clark; Innes C Cuthill; Ulrich Dirnagl; Michael Emerson; Paul Garner; Stephen T Holgate; David W Howells; Natasha A Karp; Stanley E Lazic; Katie Lidster; Catriona J MacCallum; Malcolm Macleod; Esther J Pearl; Ole H Petersen; Frances Rawle; Penny Reynolds; Kieron Rooney; Emily S Sena; Shai D Silberberg; Thomas Steckler; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.969

8.  The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research.

Authors:  Nathalie Percie du Sert; Viki Hurst; Amrita Ahluwalia; Sabina Alam; Marc T Avey; Monya Baker; William J Browne; Alejandra Clark; Innes C Cuthill; Ulrich Dirnagl; Michael Emerson; Paul Garner; Stephen T Holgate; David W Howells; Natasha A Karp; Stanley E Lazic; Katie Lidster; Catriona J MacCallum; Malcolm Macleod; Esther J Pearl; Ole H Petersen; Frances Rawle; Penny Reynolds; Kieron Rooney; Emily S Sena; Shai D Silberberg; Thomas Steckler; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science.

Authors:  Meghnaa Tallapragada; Gina M Eosco; Katherine A McComas
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Perspective: Disclosing hidden sources of funding.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.