Literature DB >> 25115563

Researcher Perspectives on Conflicts of Interest: A Qualitative Analysis of Views from Academia.

Jensen T Mecca1, Carter Gibson, Vincent Giorgini, Kelsey E Medeiros, Michael D Mumford, Shane Connelly.   

Abstract

The increasing interconnectedness of academic research and external industry has left research vulnerable to conflicts of interest. These conflicts have the potential to undermine the integrity of scientific research as well as to threaten public trust in scientific findings. The present effort sought to identify themes in the perspectives of faculty researchers regarding conflicts of interest. Think-aloud interview responses were qualitatively analyzed in an effort to provide insights with regard to appropriate ways to address the threat of conflicts of interest in research. Themes in participant responses included disclosure of conflicts of interest, self-removal from situations where conflict exists, accommodation of conflict, denial of the existence of conflict, and recognition of complexity of situations involving conflicts of interest. Moral disengagement operations are suggested to explain the appearance of each identified theme. In addition, suggestions for best practices regarding addressing conflicts of interest given these themes in faculty perspectives are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25115563      PMCID: PMC4326636          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9580-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  10 in total

1.  Trust us to make a difference: ensuring public confidence in the integrity of clinical research.

Authors:  J J Cohen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Is academic medicine for sale?

Authors:  M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent.

Authors:  Fiona Godlee; Jane Smith; Harvey Marcovitch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-05

5.  How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed.

Authors:  Brian Deer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-05

6.  Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  1999

Review 7.  Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bonnie E Glaser; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: an analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Boyd; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Industry-sponsored clinical research: a broken system.

Authors:  Marcia Angell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  A conflict of interest disclosure policy for science and engineering ethics.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird; Raymond E Spier
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.525

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science.

Authors:  Meghnaa Tallapragada; Gina M Eosco; Katherine A McComas
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The relationship between the physician and pharmaceutical industry: background ethics and regulation proposals.

Authors:  Frieder Keller; Krzysztof Marczewski; Draško Pavlović
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.351

3.  Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies.

Authors:  Giles Birchley; Richard Huxtable; Madeleine Murtagh; Ruud Ter Meulen; Peter Flach; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Building consensus on interactions between population health researchers and the food industry: Two-stage, online, international Delphi study and stakeholder survey.

Authors:  Katherine Cullerton; Jean Adams; Oliver Francis; Nita Forouhi; Martin White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.