Literature DB >> 8707496

Influences on the quality of published drug studies.

L A Bero1, D Rennie.   

Abstract

To practice evidence-based medicine, physicians need data on the clinical effectiveness, toxicity, convenience, and cost of new drugs compared with available alternatives. We give examples of published drug studies that are defective, sometimes because pharmaceutical industry funding has affected their content and quality. We make recommendations on how to avoid these defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8707496     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300009582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  50 in total

1.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation.

Authors:  A R Jadad; M Moher; G P Browman; L Booker; C Sigouin; M Fuentes; R Stevens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-26

2.  Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-15

3.  Getting it right: industry sponsorship and medical research.

Authors:  Patricia Baird
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Lisa A Bero; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Otavio Clark
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

5.  Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis-learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy.

Authors:  A Schafer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO.

Authors:  Kay Dickersin; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences. Part 1: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on the findings, protocols, and quality of drug trials.

Authors:  Gisela Schott; Henry Pachl; Ulrich Limbach; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Klaus Lieb
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Integrity in scientific publishing.

Authors:  Drummond Rennie
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Roman Jaeschke; Holger J Schünemann; Mohit Bhandari; Jan L Brozek; P J Devereaux; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-06

10.  Critical appraisal training increases understanding and confidence and enhances the use of evidence in diverse categories of learners.

Authors:  Donna H Odierna; Jenny White; Susan Forsyth; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.