Literature DB >> 16270296

3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts.

Alexander Wall1, Harald Kugel, Rainald Bachman, Lars Matuszewski, Stefan Krämer, Walter Heindel, David Maintz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the signal characteristics of different iliac artery stents in MR angiography (MRA) at 3 T in comparison with 1.5 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen iliac artery stents were implanted in plastic tubes filled with a solution of Gd-DTPA and imaged at 3 T and 1.5 T using a T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequence. Image analysis included a subjective assessment of artifact characteristics, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements in stented and unstented vessel parts, and quantitative measurements of total artifact size.
RESULTS: The pattern of stent artifacts inside the stents evidently did not differ at 3 T and 1.5 T. The average total size of the artifact areas surrounding the stents was significantly larger at 3 T (P < 0.03). However, within the stented part of the vessel phantom, the signal of the lumen and its contrast to modeled surrounding tissue was significantly higher at the higher field. The mean SNR of the lumen increased from 95.5 at 1.5 T to 127.3 at 3 T, and the CNR of the vessel increased from 70.3 to 93.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of the stent lumen in iliac artery stents in a phantom model is not compromised by imaging at 3 T compared to 1.5 T. The signal gain inside the stented part of the vessel lumen at higher field compensates for the higher degree of stent artifacts seen in stents made of steel or cobalt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16270296     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  14 in total

1.  Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas M J Frölich; Sara M Pilgram-Pastor; Marios N Psychogios; Alexander Mohr; Michael Knauth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  M Lettau; A Sauer; S Heiland; S Rohde; M Bendszus; S Hähnel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Usefulness of Silent MR Angiography for Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with a Flow-Diverter Device.

Authors:  H Oishi; T Fujii; M Suzuki; N Takano; K Teranishi; K Yatomi; T Kitamura; M Yamamoto; S Aoki; H Arai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  In vitro stent lumen visualisation of various common and newly developed femoral artery stents using MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 tesla.

Authors:  R Syha; D Ketelsen; M Kaempf; S Mangold; S Sixt; T Zeller; F Springer; F Schick; C D Claussen; K Brechtel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Outcome Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology in Unruptured Aneurysms (PEDSU).

Authors:  D Atasoy; N Kandasamy; J Hart; J Lynch; S-H Yang; D Walsh; C Tolias; T C Booth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  S R Boddu; F C Tong; S Dehkharghani; J E Dion; A M Saindane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T.

Authors:  Michael Lettau; Annett Sauer; Sabine Heiland; Stefan Rohde; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  MR angiographic evaluation is limited in intracranial aneurysms embolized with Nexus coils.

Authors:  Hyun-Seung Kang; Won-Jin Moon; Hong Gee Roh; Moon Hee Han; Woo Jin Choe; Joon Cho; Chang-Taek Moon; Young Cho Koh
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Artificial luminal narrowing on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiograms on an occasion of stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysm: in vitro comparison using two different stents with variable imaging parameters.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Seok; Hyun Seok Choi; So-Lyung Jung; Kook-Jin Ahn; Myeong Jin Kim; Yong Sam Shin; Bum-soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  The implications of magnetic resonance angiography artifacts caused by different types of intracranial flow diverters.

Authors:  Batur Halitcan; Sayin Bige; Balci Sinan; Akmangit Ilkay; Daglioglu Ergun; Alagoz Fatih; Arat Anil
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.