Literature DB >> 16263782

Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

M C Greenwood1, A J Hakim, E Carson, D V Doyle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of collecting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient self-administered outcome data using touch-screen computers in a routine out-patient clinic.
METHODS: Forty patients with RA completed the touch-screen and paper Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RAQol) in the clinic and rated ease of use and preference. Forty-five others completed the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analogue scales (VASs) for pain, fatigue and global arthritis activity on touch screen and paper and a joint assessment on touch screen. They rated ease of use and willingness to complete the assessment again. Joints were independently assessed, and completion times and technical problems recorded.
RESULTS: No technical problems were encountered. The touch-screen RAQol took no longer to complete, was preferred by 64% (33% had no preference) and was rated significantly higher for ease of use (two-tailed P=0.003, n=40) even by computer naïve patients (two-tailed P=0.031, n=24). Intraclass correlation coefficients between methods were high for RAQol (0.986) and tender joint counts (0.918), and as high for the pain, fatigue and global activity (0.855, 0.741, 0.881) as for test-retest of the paper versions (0.865, 0.746, 0.863). Ninety-eight per cent rated the touch screen very/quite easy for HAQ and VAS, and 90% for joint assessment. Ninety-six per cent stated a willingness to complete the touch-screen assessment in clinic again.
CONCLUSIONS: Touch-screen questionnaires in the clinic can produce comparable results to paper, eliminate the need for data entry and afford immediate access to results. It is an acceptable, and in many cases a preferable, option to paper, regardless of age and previous experience of computers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16263782     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  25 in total

1.  Characteristics of Participation in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Electronic Data Capture Components of NRG Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Stephanie L Pugh; Joseph P Rodgers; Katherine A Yeager; Ronald C Chen; Benjamin Movsas; Roseann Bonanni; James Dignam; Deborah W Bruner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  An electronic clinic for arthroplasty follow-up: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gavin Wood; Douglas Naudie; Steve MacDonald; Richard McCalden; Robert Bourne
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Can the e-OAKHQOL be an alternative to measure health-related quality of life in knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Maud Wieczorek; Christine Rotonda; Jonathan Epstein; Francis Guillemin; Anne-Christine Rat
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Test-retest of computerized health status questionnaires frequently used in the monitoring of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Henrik Gudbergsen; Else M Bartels; Peter Krusager; Eva E Wæhrens; Robin Christensen; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Willingness and Ability of Older Adults in the Emergency Department to Provide Clinical Information Using a Tablet Computer.

Authors:  Sruti Brahmandam; Wesley C Holland; Sowmya A Mangipudi; Valerie A Braz; Richard P Medlin; Katherine M Hunold; Christopher W Jones; Timothy F Platts-Mills
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Preferences for Use and Design of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Kelly M Dumais; Nadeeka Dias; Laura Khurana; Sarah Tressel Gary; Brooke Witherspoon; Christopher J Evans; Susan M Dallabrida
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 7.  Quality-of-life assessment in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Anthony S Russell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Systematic review and metaanalysis of patient self-report versus trained assessor joint counts in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jennifer L Barton; Lindsey A Criswell; Rachel Kaiser; Yea-Hung Chen; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Validation of Portuguese-translated computer touch-screen questionnaires in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, compared with paper formats.

Authors:  Luís Cunha-Miranda; Helena Santos; Cláudia Miguel; Cândida Silva; Filipe Barcelos; Joana Borges; Ricardo Trinca; Vera Vicente; Tiago Silva
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Logistic feasibility of health related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: results of a prospective study in a large population of chronic liver patients.

Authors:  Jolie J Gutteling; Jan J V Busschbach; Robert A de Man; Anne-Sophie E Darlington
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.