M C Greenwood1, A J Hakim, E Carson, D V Doyle. 1. The Academic Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Unit, Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust, Leytonstone, London E11 1NR, UK. Mandy.Greenwood@whippsx.nhs.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of collecting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient self-administered outcome data using touch-screen computers in a routine out-patient clinic. METHODS: Forty patients with RA completed the touch-screen and paper Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RAQol) in the clinic and rated ease of use and preference. Forty-five others completed the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analogue scales (VASs) for pain, fatigue and global arthritis activity on touch screen and paper and a joint assessment on touch screen. They rated ease of use and willingness to complete the assessment again. Joints were independently assessed, and completion times and technical problems recorded. RESULTS: No technical problems were encountered. The touch-screen RAQol took no longer to complete, was preferred by 64% (33% had no preference) and was rated significantly higher for ease of use (two-tailed P=0.003, n=40) even by computer naïve patients (two-tailed P=0.031, n=24). Intraclass correlation coefficients between methods were high for RAQol (0.986) and tender joint counts (0.918), and as high for the pain, fatigue and global activity (0.855, 0.741, 0.881) as for test-retest of the paper versions (0.865, 0.746, 0.863). Ninety-eight per cent rated the touch screen very/quite easy for HAQ and VAS, and 90% for joint assessment. Ninety-six per cent stated a willingness to complete the touch-screen assessment in clinic again. CONCLUSIONS: Touch-screen questionnaires in the clinic can produce comparable results to paper, eliminate the need for data entry and afford immediate access to results. It is an acceptable, and in many cases a preferable, option to paper, regardless of age and previous experience of computers.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of collecting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient self-administered outcome data using touch-screen computers in a routine out-patient clinic. METHODS: Forty patients with RA completed the touch-screen and paper Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RAQol) in the clinic and rated ease of use and preference. Forty-five others completed the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analogue scales (VASs) for pain, fatigue and global arthritis activity on touch screen and paper and a joint assessment on touch screen. They rated ease of use and willingness to complete the assessment again. Joints were independently assessed, and completion times and technical problems recorded. RESULTS: No technical problems were encountered. The touch-screen RAQol took no longer to complete, was preferred by 64% (33% had no preference) and was rated significantly higher for ease of use (two-tailed P=0.003, n=40) even by computer naïve patients (two-tailed P=0.031, n=24). Intraclass correlation coefficients between methods were high for RAQol (0.986) and tender joint counts (0.918), and as high for the pain, fatigue and global activity (0.855, 0.741, 0.881) as for test-retest of the paper versions (0.865, 0.746, 0.863). Ninety-eight per cent rated the touch screen very/quite easy for HAQ and VAS, and 90% for joint assessment. Ninety-six per cent stated a willingness to complete the touch-screen assessment in clinic again. CONCLUSIONS: Touch-screen questionnaires in the clinic can produce comparable results to paper, eliminate the need for data entry and afford immediate access to results. It is an acceptable, and in many cases a preferable, option to paper, regardless of age and previous experience of computers.
Authors: Stephanie L Pugh; Joseph P Rodgers; Katherine A Yeager; Ronald C Chen; Benjamin Movsas; Roseann Bonanni; James Dignam; Deborah W Bruner Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Maud Wieczorek; Christine Rotonda; Jonathan Epstein; Francis Guillemin; Anne-Christine Rat Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Henrik Gudbergsen; Else M Bartels; Peter Krusager; Eva E Wæhrens; Robin Christensen; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Henning Bliddal Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sruti Brahmandam; Wesley C Holland; Sowmya A Mangipudi; Valerie A Braz; Richard P Medlin; Katherine M Hunold; Christopher W Jones; Timothy F Platts-Mills Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-11-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kelly M Dumais; Nadeeka Dias; Laura Khurana; Sarah Tressel Gary; Brooke Witherspoon; Christopher J Evans; Susan M Dallabrida Journal: Patient Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Jolie J Gutteling; Jan J V Busschbach; Robert A de Man; Anne-Sophie E Darlington Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2008-11-10 Impact factor: 3.186