Literature DB >> 21939609

An electronic clinic for arthroplasty follow-up: a pilot study.

Gavin Wood1, Douglas Naudie, Steve MacDonald, Richard McCalden, Robert Bourne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most outpatient orthopedic follow-up visits for patients who had total joint arthroplasty are routine among those with well-functioning implants. The technology and resources now exist to enable patient assessment without requiring attendance in hospital. We tested an electronic clinic for routine follow-up in a small cohort of arthroplasty patients.
METHODS: We randomly assigned primary arthroplasty patients scheduled for routine annual outpatient review into 2 groups: group A completed a Web-based assessment 4 weeks after the clinical assessment, whereas group B completed the Web-based assessment first. Standard clinical questionnaires were included. We also collected radiographic data and information on assessment duration and cost.
RESULTS: Forty patients participated in the study. The average age of participants was 58 years. There were 12 men and 8 women in each of the 2 groups. The average total time spent by patients on an outpatient visit was 115 minutes, compared with 52 minutes for the electronic assessment. Participants reported the electronic assessment to be more convenient and less costly.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study supports the practical use of an electronic clinic for the follow-up of arthroplasty patients. Further studies examining the complex interaction of factors involved in patient clinics are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939609      PMCID: PMC3238336          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.028510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  11 in total

1.  Outcome assessment in the elderly after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G C A Wood; G J McLauchlan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.

Authors:  C A McHorney; M Kosinski; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R Wootton; S E Bloomer; R Corbett; D J Eedy; N Hicks; H E Lotery; C Mathews; J Paisley; K Steele; M A Loane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

6.  Effect of telephone followups on post vasectomy office visits.

Authors:  C Emerson; L Gibbs; S Harper; C Woodruff
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  2000-04

7.  Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M C Greenwood; A J Hakim; E Carson; D V Doyle
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up.

Authors:  J Wasson; C Gaudette; F Whaley; A Sauvigne; P Baribeau; H G Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Outcome scores collected by touchscreen: medical audit as it should be in the 21st century?

Authors:  Sean Dixon; Timothy Bunker; Daniel Chan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  'Paper Clinics'- a model for improving delivery of outpatient colorectal services.

Authors:  T R C Porrett; P J Lunniss
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  8 in total

1.  Are patients satisfied with a web-based followup after total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jacquelyn Marsh; Dianne Bryant; Steven J MacDonald; Douglas Naudie; Alliya Remtulla; Richard McCalden; James Howard; Robert Bourne; James McAuley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Virtual arthroplasty follow-up: five-year data from a district general hospital.

Authors:  R Fisher; V Hamilton; S Reader; F Khatun; M Porteous
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  An Overview of Telehealth in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric N Windsor; Abhinav K Sharma; Ioannis Gkiatas; Ameer M Elbuluk; Peter K Sculco; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-02-21

4.  Good Comes From Evil: COVID-19 and the Advent of Telemedicine in Orthopedics.

Authors:  Joseph D Lamplot; Samuel A Taylor
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-02-21

5.  Mobile Web-Based Follow-up for Postoperative ACL Reconstruction: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  James Higgins; John Semple; Lucas Murnaghan; Sarah Sharpe; John Theodoropoulos
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-22

6.  Cost-Effective Mobile-Based Healthcare System for Managing Total Joint Arthroplasty Follow-Up.

Authors:  Marina Bitsaki; George Koutras; Hansjoerg Heep; Christos Koutras
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2017-01-31

7.  Is virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement acceptable to patients and clinicians? A sequential mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Rebekah J Parkes; Joanne Palmer; Jennifer Wingham; Dan H Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-03-01

8.  Identifying complications requiring re-operation following primary hip or knee arthroplasty: a consecutive series of 98 patients.

Authors:  Bill Reynolds; Nick Maister; Stephen D Gill; Shaun Waring; Peter Schoch; Sally Beattie; Andrew Thomson; Richard S Page
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.