BACKGROUND: To compare data based on touch screen to data based on traditional paper versions of questionnaires frequently used to examine patient reported outcomes in knee osteoarthritis patients and to examine the impact of patient characteristics on this comparison METHODS:Participants were recruited from an ongoing trial (http://ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT00655941). 20 female participants, mean age 67 (SD 7), completed KOOS, VAS pain, function and patient global, SF-36, Physical Activity Scale, painDETECT, and the ADL Taxonomy. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two subgroups, completing either the paper or touch screen version first. Mean, mean differences (95% CI), median, median differences and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for all questionnaires. RESULTS: ICCs between data based on computerized and paper versions ranged from 0.86 to 0.99. Analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between versions of the ADL Taxonomy, but not for the remaining questionnaires. Age, computer experience or education-level had no significant impact on the results. The computerized questionnaires were reported to be easier to use. CONCLUSION: The computerized questionnaires gave comparable results to answers given on paper. Patient characteristics did not influence results and implementation was feasible.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To compare data based on touch screen to data based on traditional paper versions of questionnaires frequently used to examine patient reported outcomes in knee osteoarthritispatients and to examine the impact of patient characteristics on this comparison METHODS:Participants were recruited from an ongoing trial (http://ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT00655941). 20 female participants, mean age 67 (SD 7), completed KOOS, VAS pain, function and patient global, SF-36, Physical Activity Scale, painDETECT, and the ADL Taxonomy. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two subgroups, completing either the paper or touch screen version first. Mean, mean differences (95% CI), median, median differences and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for all questionnaires. RESULTS: ICCs between data based on computerized and paper versions ranged from 0.86 to 0.99. Analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between versions of the ADL Taxonomy, but not for the remaining questionnaires. Age, computer experience or education-level had no significant impact on the results. The computerized questionnaires were reported to be easier to use. CONCLUSION: The computerized questionnaires gave comparable results to answers given on paper. Patient characteristics did not influence results and implementation was feasible.
Authors: T K Kvien; P Mowinckel; T Heiberg; K L Dammann; Ø Dale; G J Aanerud; T N Alme; T Uhlig Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-04-20 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Brooke E Patterson; Adam G Culvenor; Christian J Barton; Ali Guermazi; Joshua J Stefanik; Kay M Crossley Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Shawn C Sorenson; Russell Romano; Robin M Scholefield; E Todd Schroeder; Stanley P Azen; George J Salem Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Cecilie L Daugaard; Robert Gc Riis; Elisabeth Bandak; Henrik Gudbergsen; Marius Henriksen; Henning Bliddal; Mikael Boesen Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Santiago Perez-Lloret; Daniel Ciampi de Andrade; Kelly E Lyons; Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez; Kallol Ray Chaudhuri; Guenther Deuschl; Girgio Cruccu; Cristina Sampaio; Christopher G Goetz; Anette Schrag; Pablo Martinez-Martin; Glenn Stebbins Journal: Mov Disord Clin Pract Date: 2016-06-24
Authors: Henrik Gudbergsen; Mikael Boesen; Robin Christensen; Else Marie Bartels; Marius Henriksen; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Henning Bliddal Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 2.362