Sruti Brahmandam1, Wesley C Holland2, Sowmya A Mangipudi2, Valerie A Braz3, Richard P Medlin4, Katherine M Hunold5, Christopher W Jones3, Timothy F Platts-Mills2,6. 1. Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper Medical School, Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. 6. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of older adults in the emergency department (ED) who are willing and able to use a tablet computer to answer questions. DESIGN: Prospective, ED-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Two U.S. academic EDs. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: As part of screening for another study, potential study participants were asked whether they would be willing to use a tablet computer to answer eight questions instead of answering questions orally. A custom user interface optimized for older adults was used. Trained research assistants observed study participants as they used the tablets. Ability to use the tablet was assessed based on need for assistance and number of questions answered correctly. RESULTS: Of 365 individuals approached, 248 (68%) were willing to answer screening questions, 121 of these (49%) were willing to use a tablet computer; of these, 91 (75%) were able to answer at least six questions correctly, and 35 (29%) did not require assistance. Only 14 (12%) were able to answer all eight questions correctly without assistance. Individuals aged 65 to 74 and those reporting use of a touchscreen device at least weekly were more likely to be willing and able to use the tablet computer. Of individuals with no or mild cognitive impairment, the percentage willing to use the tablet was 45%, and the percentage answering all questions correctly was 32%. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of this sample of older adults in the ED was willing to provide information using a tablet computer, but only a small minority of these were able to enter all information correctly without assistance. Tablet computers may provide an efficient means of collecting clinical information from some older adults in the ED, but at present, it will be ineffective for a significant portion of this population.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of older adults in the emergency department (ED) who are willing and able to use a tablet computer to answer questions. DESIGN: Prospective, ED-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Two U.S. academic EDs. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: As part of screening for another study, potential study participants were asked whether they would be willing to use a tablet computer to answer eight questions instead of answering questions orally. A custom user interface optimized for older adults was used. Trained research assistants observed study participants as they used the tablets. Ability to use the tablet was assessed based on need for assistance and number of questions answered correctly. RESULTS: Of 365 individuals approached, 248 (68%) were willing to answer screening questions, 121 of these (49%) were willing to use a tablet computer; of these, 91 (75%) were able to answer at least six questions correctly, and 35 (29%) did not require assistance. Only 14 (12%) were able to answer all eight questions correctly without assistance. Individuals aged 65 to 74 and those reporting use of a touchscreen device at least weekly were more likely to be willing and able to use the tablet computer. Of individuals with no or mild cognitive impairment, the percentage willing to use the tablet was 45%, and the percentage answering all questions correctly was 32%. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of this sample of older adults in the ED was willing to provide information using a tablet computer, but only a small minority of these were able to enter all information correctly without assistance. Tablet computers may provide an efficient means of collecting clinical information from some older adults in the ED, but at present, it will be ineffective for a significant portion of this population.
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Marilyn Bromley; Jeffrey M Caterino; Audrey Chun; Lowell W Gerson; Jason Greenspan; Ula Hwang; David P John; William L Lyons; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Betty Mortensen; Luna Ragsdale; Mark Rosenberg; Scott Wilber Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Greg F Pereira; Cynthia M Bulik; Mark A Weaver; Wesley C Holland; Timothy F Platts-Mills Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Tarshona B Stevens; Natalie L Richmond; Gregory F Pereira; Christina L Shenvi; Timothy F Platts-Mills Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: D B Herrick; A Nakhasi; B Nelson; S Rice; P A Abbott; A S Saber Tehrani; R E Rothman; H P Lehmann; D E Newman-Toker Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Kyle M Roedersheimer; Greg F Pereira; Christopher W Jones; Valerie A Braz; Sowmya A Mangipudi; Timothy F Platts-Mills Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Mandana Khalili; Nicole J Kim; Janice Y Tsoh; Judith M E Walsh; L Elizabeth Goldman; Ginny Gildengorin; Ching Wong; Mi T Tran; Edgar Yu; Michael Thanh Sharp; Vivian H LeTran; Vi-Van Nguyen; Tung T Nguyen Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Francesca M Nicosia; Malena J Spar; Alicia Neumann; Molly C Silvestrini; Maureen Barrientos; Rebecca T Brown Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Katherine M Hunold; Elizabeth M Goldberg; Jeffrey M Caterino; Ula Hwang; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Manish N Shah; Tony Rosen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Elizabeth M Goldberg; Michelle P Lin; Laura G Burke; Frances N Jiménez; Natalie M Davoodi; Roland C Merchant Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Annette Eidam; Anja Roth; Eduard Frick; Michael Metzner; Anette Lampert; Hanna M Seidling; Walter E Haefeli; Jürgen M Bauer Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2022-07-23 Impact factor: 2.314
Authors: Deepak Palakshappa; Andrew J Benefield; Katherine F Furgurson; Michael G Harley; Richa Bundy; Adam Moses; Alysha J Taxter; Andrew S Bensinger; Xiangkun Cao; Nancy Denizard-Thompson; Gary E Rosenthal; David P Miller Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 2.290
Authors: Elizabeth M Goldberg; Frances N Jiménez; Kevin Chen; Natalie M Davoodi; Melinda Li; Daniel H Strauss; Maria Zou; Kate Guthrie; Roland C Merchant Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 7.538