OBJECTIVE: To describe intensive care unit (ICU) discharge practices, examine factors associated with physicians' discharge decisions, and explore ICU and hospital characteristics and clinical determinants associated with the discharge process. DESIGN: Survey in adult ICUs affiliated with the Swiss Society of Intensive Care Medicine. INTERVENTIONS: Questionnaire inquiring about ICU structure and organization mailed to 73 medical directors. Level of monitoring, intravenous medications, and physiological variables were proposed as elements of discharge decision. Five clinical situations were presented with request to assign a discharge disposition. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Fifty-five ICUs participated, representing 75% of adult Swiss ICUs. Responsibility for patient management was assigned in 91% to the ICU team directing patient care. Only 22% of responding centers used written discharge guidelines. One-half of the respondents considered at least 10 of 15 proposed criteria to decide patient discharge. ICUs in central referral hospitals used fewer criteria than community and private hospitals. The availability of intermediate care units was significantly greater in university hospitals. The ICU director's level of experience was not associated with the number of criteria used. In the five clinical scenarios there was wide variation in discharge decision. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that there is marked heterogeneity in ICUs discharge practices, and that discharge decisions may be influenced by institutional factors. University teaching hospitals had more intermediate care facilities available. Written discharge guidelines were not widely used.
OBJECTIVE: To describe intensive care unit (ICU) discharge practices, examine factors associated with physicians' discharge decisions, and explore ICU and hospital characteristics and clinical determinants associated with the discharge process. DESIGN: Survey in adult ICUs affiliated with the Swiss Society of Intensive Care Medicine. INTERVENTIONS: Questionnaire inquiring about ICU structure and organization mailed to 73 medical directors. Level of monitoring, intravenous medications, and physiological variables were proposed as elements of discharge decision. Five clinical situations were presented with request to assign a discharge disposition. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Fifty-five ICUs participated, representing 75% of adult Swiss ICUs. Responsibility for patient management was assigned in 91% to the ICU team directing patient care. Only 22% of responding centers used written discharge guidelines. One-half of the respondents considered at least 10 of 15 proposed criteria to decide patient discharge. ICUs in central referral hospitals used fewer criteria than community and private hospitals. The availability of intermediate care units was significantly greater in university hospitals. The ICU director's level of experience was not associated with the number of criteria used. In the five clinical scenarios there was wide variation in discharge decision. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that there is marked heterogeneity in ICUs discharge practices, and that discharge decisions may be influenced by institutional factors. University teaching hospitals had more intermediate care facilities available. Written discharge guidelines were not widely used.
Authors: J S Groeger; M A Strosberg; N A Halpern; R C Raphaely; W E Kaye; K K Guntupalli; D L Bertram; D M Greenbaum; T P Clemmer; T J Gallagher Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Gaetano Iapichino; Alberto Morabito; Giovanni Mistraletti; Luca Ferla; Danilo Radrizzani; Dinis Reis Miranda Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-08-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-02-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Yong Suk Jo; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Ho Il Yoon; Jae Ho Lee; Choon-Taek Lee; Young-Jae Cho Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Viktoria D Mayr; Martin W Dünser; Veronika Greil; Stefan Jochberger; Günter Luckner; Hanno Ulmer; Barbara E Friesenecker; Jukka Takala; Walter R Hasibeder Journal: Crit Care Date: 2006 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Nelleke van Sluisveld; Gijs Hesselink; Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven; Gert Westert; Hub Wollersheim; Marieke Zegers Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Henry T Stelfox; Laure Perrier; Sharon E Straus; William A Ghali; David Zygun; Paul Boiteau; Danny J Zuege Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 2.692