PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and contextual factors that influence physiotherapists' discharge decision-making processes in outpatient orthopaedic settings. METHODS: The study used a descriptive qualitative design that included three key-informant interviews and two focus groups (n=7) of orthopaedic physiotherapists (total n=10) working in the Greater Toronto Area. Interviews and focus groups followed a semi-structured interview guide that included questions pertaining to participants' discharge decision-making processes, salient contextual factors, and challenges. Data were coded and analyzed for emerging categories and themes using constant comparison techniques and group analyses. RESULTS: Participants indicated that a combination of factors and strategies were brought to bear on discharge decision making but that the process changed with clinical experience. Over time, further emphasis was attributed to the patient's role in his or her rehabilitation, and self-management goals were increasingly promoted. Experience affected how therapists conceptualized their roles in discharge decisions and how they negotiated goals with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge decision making is a complex process that requires integrating numerous factors and negotiating with patients. Physiotherapists' decision-making practices evolve with experience and reveal the complexity of implementing models of "client-centred care" in practice. Further research is needed to explore these findings in other settings.
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical and contextual factors that influence physiotherapists' discharge decision-making processes in outpatient orthopaedic settings. METHODS: The study used a descriptive qualitative design that included three key-informant interviews and two focus groups (n=7) of orthopaedic physiotherapists (total n=10) working in the Greater Toronto Area. Interviews and focus groups followed a semi-structured interview guide that included questions pertaining to participants' discharge decision-making processes, salient contextual factors, and challenges. Data were coded and analyzed for emerging categories and themes using constant comparison techniques and group analyses. RESULTS:Participants indicated that a combination of factors and strategies were brought to bear on discharge decision making but that the process changed with clinical experience. Over time, further emphasis was attributed to the patient's role in his or her rehabilitation, and self-management goals were increasingly promoted. Experience affected how therapists conceptualized their roles in discharge decisions and how they negotiated goals with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge decision making is a complex process that requires integrating numerous factors and negotiating with patients. Physiotherapists' decision-making practices evolve with experience and reveal the complexity of implementing models of "client-centred care" in practice. Further research is needed to explore these findings in other settings.
Authors: C Cedraschi; J Desmeules; E Rapiti; E Baumgartner; P Cohen; A Finckh; A F Allaz; T L Vischer Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 19.103