Literature DB >> 16242910

Belief or Need? Accounting for individual variations in the neurochemistry of the placebo effect.

Jon-Kar Zubieta1, Wai-Ying Yau, David J Scott, Christian S Stohler.   

Abstract

The activation of pain-suppressive, endogenous opioid neurotransmission after administration of a placebo with expectation of analgesia has been directly demonstrated in humans using molecular imaging techniques in recent work. Regional effects were described in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, pregenual anterior cingulate, anterior insula, and nucleus accumbens. However, it was also observed that the magnitude of these responses was subject to substantial individual and regional variation. The present study was undertaken to examine the contribution of various factors to the observed variability in the neurochemical responses to placebo administration. Multiple regression analyses were conducted on data from 19 healthy males to study to what degree expectations of analgesia and various elements of the experience of pain itself, in the absence of placebo, were associated with the individual and brain regional variability in endogenous opioid neurochemical responses to placebo. A model that included affective qualities of pain, the volume of algesic stimulus required to maintain pain over the experimental period within a moderate range, and the internal affective state of the volunteers contributed to 40-68% of the variance in the regional neurochemical responses to placebo. These initial data suggests that in the case of endogenous opioid mediated placebo analgesic responses, the individual experience of pain, in particular its affective elements, the internal affective state of the individuals during pain and a measure of sustained pain sensitivity are important factors contributing to the formation of a placebo effect. Further examination of individual variations in placebo responding will need to take into account the underlying process for which relief is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16242910     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2005.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Immun        ISSN: 0889-1591            Impact factor:   7.217


  26 in total

1.  Getting the pain you expect: mechanisms of placebo, nocebo and reappraisal effects in humans.

Authors:  Irene Tracey
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Association Between Placebo-Activated Neural Systems and Antidepressant Responses: Neurochemistry of Placebo Effects in Major Depression.

Authors:  Marta Peciña; Amy S B Bohnert; Magdalena Sikora; Erich T Avery; Scott A Langenecker; Brian J Mickey; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Believe in your placebo.

Authors:  David A Seminowicz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Placebo effects in laser-evoked pain potentials.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Dagfinn Matre; Kenneth L Casey
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 5.  Do the neural correlates of acupuncture and placebo effects differ?

Authors:  Rupali P Dhond; Norman Kettner; Vitaly Napadow
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  [Laser acupuncture for chronic back pain. A double-blind clinical study].

Authors:  M Ruth; M Weber; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 7.  Experimental designs and brain mapping approaches for studying the placebo analgesic effect.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Fabrizio Benedetti; Carlo Adolfo Porro
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Disgust regulation via placebo: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Anne Schienle; Sonja Übel; Florian Schöngaßner; Rottraut Ille; Wilfried Scharmüller
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Placebo expectations and the detection of somatic information.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Justin A Wellman; Stephanie L Fowler; Heather M Rasinski; Suzanne G Helfer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-11-03

10.  The impact of psychological factors on placebo responses in a randomized controlled trial comparing sham device to dummy pill.

Authors:  Suzanne M Bertisch; Anna R T Legedza; Russell S Phillips; Roger B Davis; William B Stason; Rose H Goldman; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.