Marta Peciña1, Amy S B Bohnert2, Magdalena Sikora1, Erich T Avery1, Scott A Langenecker3, Brian J Mickey1, Jon-Kar Zubieta4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor2Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois, Chicago. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor4Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: High placebo responses have been observed across a wide range of pathologies, severely impacting drug development. OBJECTIVE: To examine neurochemical mechanisms underlying the formation of placebo effects in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this study involving 2 placebo lead-in phases followed by an open antidepressant administration, we performed a single-blinded 2-week crossover randomized clinical trial of 2 identical oral placebos (described as having either active or inactive fast-acting antidepressant-like effects) followed by a 10-week open-label treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or, in some cases, another agent as clinically indicated. The volunteers (35 medication-free patients with MDD at a university health system) were studied with positron emission tomography and the µ-opioid receptor-selective radiotracer [11C]carfentanil after each 1-week inactive and active oral placebo treatment. In addition, 1 mL of isotonic saline was administered intravenously within sight of the volunteer during positron emission tomographic scanning every 4 minutes over 20 minutes only after the 1-week active placebo treatment, with instructions that the compound may be associated with the activation of brain systems involved in mood improvement. This challenge stimulus was used to test the individual capacity to acutely activate endogenous opioid neurotransmision under expectations of antidepressant effect. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in depressive symptoms in response to active placebo and antidepressant. Baseline and activation measures of µ-opioid receptor binding. RESULTS: Higher baseline µ-opioid receptor binding in the nucleus accumbens was associated with better response to antidepressant treatment (r = 0.48; P = .02). Reductions in depressive symptoms after 1 week of active placebo treatment, compared with the inactive, were associated with increased placebo-induced µ-opioid neurotransmission in a network of regions implicated in emotion, stress regulation, and the pathophysiology of MDD, namely, the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, nucleus accumbens, midline thalamus, and amygdala (nucleus accumbens: r = 0.6; P < .001). Placebo-induced endogenous opioid release in these regions was associated with better antidepressant treatment response, predicting 43% of the variance in symptom improvement at the end of the antidepressant trial. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These data demonstrate that placebo-induced activation of the µ-opioid system is implicated in the formation of placebo antidepressant effects in patients with MDD and also participate in antidepressant responses, conferring illness resiliency, during open administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT02178696.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: High placebo responses have been observed across a wide range of pathologies, severely impacting drug development. OBJECTIVE: To examine neurochemical mechanisms underlying the formation of placebo effects in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this study involving 2 placebo lead-in phases followed by an open antidepressant administration, we performed a single-blinded 2-week crossover randomized clinical trial of 2 identical oral placebos (described as having either active or inactive fast-acting antidepressant-like effects) followed by a 10-week open-label treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or, in some cases, another agent as clinically indicated. The volunteers (35 medication-free patients with MDD at a university health system) were studied with positron emission tomography and the µ-opioid receptor-selective radiotracer [11C]carfentanil after each 1-week inactive and active oral placebo treatment. In addition, 1 mL of isotonic saline was administered intravenously within sight of the volunteer during positron emission tomographic scanning every 4 minutes over 20 minutes only after the 1-week active placebo treatment, with instructions that the compound may be associated with the activation of brain systems involved in mood improvement. This challenge stimulus was used to test the individual capacity to acutely activate endogenous opioid neurotransmision under expectations of antidepressant effect. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in depressive symptoms in response to active placebo and antidepressant. Baseline and activation measures of µ-opioid receptor binding. RESULTS: Higher baseline µ-opioid receptor binding in the nucleus accumbens was associated with better response to antidepressant treatment (r = 0.48; P = .02). Reductions in depressive symptoms after 1 week of active placebo treatment, compared with the inactive, were associated with increased placebo-induced µ-opioid neurotransmission in a network of regions implicated in emotion, stress regulation, and the pathophysiology of MDD, namely, the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, nucleus accumbens, midline thalamus, and amygdala (nucleus accumbens: r = 0.6; P < .001). Placebo-induced endogenous opioid release in these regions was associated with better antidepressant treatment response, predicting 43% of the variance in symptom improvement at the end of the antidepressant trial. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These data demonstrate that placebo-induced activation of the µ-opioid system is implicated in the formation of placebo antidepressant effects in patients with MDD and also participate in antidepressant responses, conferring illness resiliency, during open administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT02178696.
Authors: Vishvarani Wanigasekera; Michael C Lee; Richard Rogers; Yazhuo Kong; Siri Leknes; Jesper Andersson; Irene Tracey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Zhishun Wang; Bradley S Peterson; Melanie M Wall; Ying Chen; Tor D Wager; Patrick J Brown; Steven P Roose; Bret R Rutherford Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-05-26 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Elizabeth A Bartlett; Christine DeLorenzo; Priya Sharma; Jie Yang; Mengru Zhang; Eva Petkova; Myrna Weissman; Patrick J McGrath; Maurizio Fava; R Todd Ogden; Benji T Kurian; Ashley Malchow; Crystal M Cooper; Joseph M Trombello; Melvin McInnis; Phillip Adams; Maria A Oquendo; Diego A Pizzagalli; Madhukar Trivedi; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Marta Peciña; Magdalena Sikora; Erich T Avery; Joseph Heffernan; Susana Peciña; Brian J Mickey; Jon-Kar Zubieta Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Stephan F Taylor; S Shaun Ho; Tessa Abagis; Mike Angstadt; Daniel F Maixner; Robert C Welsh; Luis Hernandez-Garcia Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: David Fraguas; Covadonga M Díaz-Caneja; Laura Pina-Camacho; Daniel Umbricht; Celso Arango Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Noah S Philip; Jennifer Barredo; Mascha van 't Wout-Frank; Audrey R Tyrka; Lawrence H Price; Linda L Carpenter Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Magdalena Sikora; Joseph Heffernan; Erich T Avery; Brian J Mickey; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Marta Peciña Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2016-01