Literature DB >> 19239577

The impact of psychological factors on placebo responses in a randomized controlled trial comparing sham device to dummy pill.

Suzanne M Bertisch1, Anna R T Legedza, Russell S Phillips, Roger B Davis, William B Stason, Rose H Goldman, Ted J Kaptchuk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore to what extent psychological factors such as expectation, depression, anxiety and belief in alternative medicine impact placebo response and differential responses to separate placebo interventions.
METHODS: We analysed data from a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the clinical response of two distinct placebo treatments (sham acupuncture device and placebo pill) in 119 participants with persistent distal upper arm pain due to repetitive stress injury. We used a multivariable linear regression model to identify potential correlates of self-reported upper extremity pain at the end of treatment in both placebo arms of the study combined. We also performed stratified analyses by placebo treatment.
RESULTS: We did not find any of the psychological factors of interest to be associated with pain at the end of treatment in our combined analysis. We found higher baseline pain score and pain for longer than 1 year's duration to be significantly associated with higher pain scores at the end of treatment for the placebo treatments combined. In stratified analyses, for the sham acupuncture group, we found higher baseline depression score, higher baseline pain score and younger age to be independently correlated with higher pain score at the end of treatment. For the placebo pill group, only baseline pain was significantly correlated to pain score at the end of treatment.
CONCLUSION: In this trial, neither expectancy nor psychological states were associated with response to placebo, with the exception of baseline depression score for the sham acupuncture arm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19239577      PMCID: PMC4462242          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00942.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  17 in total

1.  Response expectancies in placebo analgesia and their clinical relevance.

Authors:  Antonella Pollo; Martina Amanzio; Anna Arslanian; Caterina Casadio; Giuliano Maggi; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment.

Authors:  A Hróbjartsson; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  NON-SPECIFIC FACTORS IN TREATMENT. I. REVIEW OF PLACEBO REACTIONS AND PLACEBO REACTORS.

Authors:  G HONIGFELD
Journal:  Dis Nerv Syst       Date:  1964-03

Review 4.  The placebo effect: dissolving the expectancy versus conditioning debate.

Authors:  Steve Stewart-Williams; John Podd
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The placebo reactor: thesis, antithesis, synthesis, and hypothesis.

Authors:  S Fisher
Journal:  Dis Nerv Syst       Date:  1967-08

Review 6.  Placebos, drug effects, and study design: a clinician's guide.

Authors:  F M Quitkin
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Patient expectations in placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  David A Stone; Catherine E Kerr; Eric Jacobson; Lisa A Conboy; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 8.  Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes.

Authors:  M V Mondloch; D C Cole; J W Frank
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Effects of perceived treatment on quality of life and medical outcomes in a double-blind placebo surgery trial.

Authors:  Cynthia McRae; Eva Cherin; T Gayle Yamazaki; Gretchen Diem; Alexander H Vo; Dan Russell; J Heiner Ellgring; Stanley Fahn; Paul Greene; Sandra Dillon; Hal Winfield; Kimberly B Bjugstad; Curt R Freed
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2004-04

10.  Subject expectations of treatment effectiveness and outcome of treatment with an experimental antidepressant.

Authors:  Heather V Krell; Andrew F Leuchter; Melinda Morgan; Ian A Cook; Michelle Abrams
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Placebo response: a consideration of its role in therapeutics.

Authors:  Richard L Kradin
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Is acupuncture no more than a placebo? Extensive discussion required about possible bias.

Authors:  Shizhe Deng; Xiaofeng Zhao; Rong DU; S I He; Yan Wen; Linghui Huang; Guang Tian; Chao Zhang; Zhihong Meng; Xuemin Shi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Psychologic Factors Do Not Affect Placebo Responses After Upper Extremity Injections: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Tom J Crijns; Teun Teunis; Neal C Chen; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A systematic review of the effect of expectancy on treatment responses to acupuncture.

Authors:  Ben Colagiuri; Caroline A Smith
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  Placebo and other psychological interactions in headache treatment.

Authors:  A Autret; D Valade; S Debiais
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 7.277

6.  Placebo by proxy expectations toward acupuncture change over time: a survey comparing parental expectations to acupuncture pre- and postoperatively.

Authors:  Ingrid Liodden; Are Hugo Pripp; Arne Johan Norheim
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.659

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.