Literature DB >> 20872127

[Laser acupuncture for chronic back pain. A double-blind clinical study].

M Ruth1, M Weber, M Zenz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laser acupuncture for the clinical picture of chronic back pain under everyday conditions using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. A further aim was to analyze to what extent placebo effects also influence the outcome of acupuncture under these conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included male and female patients with chronic back pain (lasting longer than 6 months) aged between 30 and 77 years with a pain score of at least 5 on a visual analog scale. The main criterion was achieving alleviation of pain by at least 50% 3 months after the start of treatment. The assessment tools used were the Von Korff questionnaire supplemented by the FFbH, FABQ, and SF-12. In addition, the participants were questioned about whether they perceived anything during the treatment and how certain they were that they had received treatment with active or inactive lasers.
RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were included in the study and were treated according to the randomization list in two groups each consisting of 51 subjects. The study was completed as scheduled by 102 participants. Analysis of the primary outcome measure, improvement of the pain score by more than 50% over baseline, revealed improvements in both treatment groups between the time points used for measurement. The placebo group exhibited better levels than the group that received laser treatment. No efficacy advantage of laser acupuncture over placebo treatment could be determined.
CONCLUSION: It was possible to completely blind the acupuncture forms with the study design employed. Perhaps the consistent exclusion of nonspecific treatment effects contributed to this result. It cannot be ruled out that the effects of acupuncture are based on a strong placebo effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20872127     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-010-0966-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  25 in total

1.  Response variability to analgesics: a role for non-specific activation of endogenous opioids.

Authors:  Martina Amanzio; Antonella Pollo; Giuliano Maggi; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  The placebo effect in alternative medicine: can the performance of a healing ritual have clinical significance?

Authors:  Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Neurobiological mechanisms of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Helen S Mayberg; Tor D Wager; Christian S Stohler; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cortical correlates of false expectations during pain intensity judgments--a possible manifestation of placebo/nocebo cognitions.

Authors:  Jürgen Lorenz; Michael Hauck; Robert C Paur; Yoko Nakamura; Roger Zimmermann; Burkhart Bromm; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 5.  A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought.

Authors:  Donald D Price; Damien G Finniss; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 6.  Overt versus covert treatment for pain, anxiety, and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Leonardo Lopiano; Michele Lanotte; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 7.  Placebo: misunderstandings and prejudices.

Authors:  Matthias Breidert; Karl Hofbauer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  [Multidisciplinary treatment program on chronic low back pain, part 4. Prognosis of treatment outcome and final conclusions].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; J Hildebrandt; P Saur; C Franz; D Seeger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1997-02-25       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Ten Years Evidence-based High-Tech Acupuncture--A Short Review of Peripherally Measured Effects.

Authors:  Gerhard Litscher
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 10.  Low level laser therapy for nonspecific low-back pain.

Authors:  R Yousefi-Nooraie; E Schonstein; K Heidari; A Rashidian; V Pennick; M Akbari-Kamrani; S Irani; B Shakiba; S A Mortaz Hejri; S O Mortaz Hejri; A Jonaidi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Tom Bjørkli; Philip Bright; Dévan Rajendran; Rachelle Buchbinder; Martin Underwood; David Evans; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Low-dose laser acupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gregory Glazov; Michael Yelland; Jon Emery
Journal:  Acupunct Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 3.  Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Gregory Glazov; Michael Yelland; Jon Emery
Journal:  Acupunct Med       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.267

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.