Literature DB >> 16239789

Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: do the polyethylene bearings rotate?

Douglas A Dennis1, Richard D Komistek, Mohamed R Mahfouz, Joel T Outten, Adrija Sharma.   

Abstract

In vivo kinematics were determined during a weightbearing deep knee bend in 39 patients implanted with four different designs of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty to assess polyethylene bearing mobility patterns and magnitudes. The femoral and tibial components and mobile polyethylene insert (implanted with four tantalum beads) were overlaid onto the fluoroscopic images using a three-dimensional model-fitting technique to determine bearing mobility. Three of the four designs were tested at a single time interval while one was evaluated at two postoperative intervals, (12 months apart) to assess changes in bearing mobility with time. All patients had polyethylene bearing rotation relative to the tibial tray and minimal rotation relative to the femoral component. The average maximum amounts of bearing rotation ranged from 8.4 degrees to 10.3 degrees (range, 3.0 degrees -20.1 degrees). In patients evaluated at two time intervals, the average maximum bearing rotation increased from 8.5 degrees (range, 3.4 degrees -15.5 degrees) at 3 months to 9.8 degrees (range, 48 degrees -14.1 degrees) 15 months postoperatively. The presented data demonstrates polyethylene bearing mobility occurs following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty and mobility is maintained during the time interval tested. The presence of bearing mobility should result in lower contact stresses reducing the potential for polyethylene wear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16239789     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000185464.23505.6e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  Kinematics of a highly congruent mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  N Wolterbeek; E H Garling; B J A Mertens; H M J van der Linden; R G H H Nelissen; E R Valstar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Mobility of the rotating platform in low contact stress knee arthroplasty is durable.

Authors:  Arthur Zürcher; Kim van Hutten; Jaap Harlaar; Ruud Pöll
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Is there any superiority in the clinical outcome of mobile-bearing knee prosthesis designs compared to fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis designs in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint? A review of the literature.

Authors:  H Van der Bracht; G Van Maele; P Verdonk; K F Almqvist; R Verdonk; M Freeman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Different intraoperative kinematics with comparable clinical outcomes of ultracongruent and posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Woo Kim; Sang Min Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Sahnghoon Lee; Jak Jang; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Modifications of femoral component design in multi-radius total knee arthroplasty lead to higher lateral posterior femoro-tibial translation.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Philippe Moewis; Patrick Stein; Heide Boeth; Adam Trepczynski; Philipp von Roth; Georg N Duda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparison of ultra-congruent mobile- and fixed-bearing navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Jung-Won Lim; Young-Bong Ko; Min-Gu Song; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Confirmation of long-term in vivo bearing mobility in eight rotating-platform TKAs.

Authors:  Michael T LaCour; Adrija Sharma; Christopher B Carr; Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Lack of axial rotation in mobile-bearing knee designs.

Authors:  Ray C Wasielewski; Richard D Komistek; Sumesh M Zingde; Kate C Sheridan; Mohamed R Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Patient-reported outcome correlates with knee function after a single-design mobile-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Jean-Noel Argenson; Sebastien Parratte; Abdullah Ashour; Richard D Komistek; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Lateral retinacular release rates in mobile- versus fixed-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Charles C Yang; Lee A McFadden; Douglas A Dennis; Raymond H Kim; Adrija Sharma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.