OBJECTIVES: To compare coronary calcium scoring results (calcium volume, calcium mass, Agatston score, and number of lesions) of different slice thicknesses using a 16-slice CT (MSCT) scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nonmoving anthropomorphic thorax phantom with calcium cylinders of different sizes and densities was scanned 30 times with repositioning applying a standardized retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT (SOMATOM Sensation 16; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) scan protocol: collimation 12 x 0.75 mm, tube voltage 120 kV, effective tube current time-product 133 mAs(eff). Fifty patients (29 male; age 57.2 +/- 8.4 years) underwent a nonenhanced scan applying the same scan protocol. Two image sets (effective slice thicknesses 3 mm and 1 mm) were reconstructed at 60% of the RR interval. Image noise was measured in both studies. Calcium volume, calcium mass and Agatston score were calculated using a commercially available software tool. RESULTS: Due to increased image noise in thinner slices, calcium scoring in all scans was performed applying a scoring threshold of 350 HU. In the phantom study, 1-mm slices showed significantly higher scoring results in respect to calcium volume (+8.2%), calcium mass (+12.5%), and Agatston score (+5.3%) (all P < 0.0001). In the patient study, 27 patients had coronary calcifications in 3-mm slices, and 31 patients had coronary calcifications in 1-mm slices. Thinner slices showed significantly higher scoring results in respect to volume (+47.1%), mass (+47.2%), and Agatston score (+29.7%) (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When comparing 3-mm and 1-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring in MSCT, thinner slices lead to significantly increased scoring results.
OBJECTIVES: To compare coronary calcium scoring results (calcium volume, calcium mass, Agatston score, and number of lesions) of different slice thicknesses using a 16-slice CT (MSCT) scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nonmoving anthropomorphic thorax phantom with calcium cylinders of different sizes and densities was scanned 30 times with repositioning applying a standardized retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT (SOMATOM Sensation 16; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) scan protocol: collimation 12 x 0.75 mm, tube voltage 120 kV, effective tube current time-product 133 mAs(eff). Fifty patients (29 male; age 57.2 +/- 8.4 years) underwent a nonenhanced scan applying the same scan protocol. Two image sets (effective slice thicknesses 3 mm and 1 mm) were reconstructed at 60% of the RR interval. Image noise was measured in both studies. Calcium volume, calcium mass and Agatston score were calculated using a commercially available software tool. RESULTS: Due to increased image noise in thinner slices, calcium scoring in all scans was performed applying a scoring threshold of 350 HU. In the phantom study, 1-mm slices showed significantly higher scoring results in respect to calcium volume (+8.2%), calcium mass (+12.5%), and Agatston score (+5.3%) (all P < 0.0001). In the patient study, 27 patients had coronary calcifications in 3-mm slices, and 31 patients had coronary calcifications in 1-mm slices. Thinner slices showed significantly higher scoring results in respect to volume (+47.1%), mass (+47.2%), and Agatston score (+29.7%) (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When comparing 3-mm and 1-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring in MSCT, thinner slices lead to significantly increased scoring results.
Authors: N Reinsch; A A Mahabadi; N Lehmann; S Möhlenkamp; C Hoefs; B Sievers; T Budde; R Seibel; K-H Jöckel; R Erbel Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Georg Mühlenbruch; Ernst Klotz; Joachim E Wildberger; Ralf Koos; Marco Das; Matthias Niethammer; Christian Hohl; Dagmar Honnef; Christoph Thomas; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: N R van der Werf; M J Willemink; T P Willems; R Vliegenthart; M J W Greuter; T Leiner Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Philipp G C Begemann; Udo van Stevendaal; Ralph Koester; Andreas H Mahnken; Andreas Koops; Gerhard Adam; Michael Grass; Claus Nolte-Ernsting Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Jared L Christensen; Esseim Sharma; Anastassia Y Gorvitovskaia; Jerome P Watts; Maen Assali; Jade Neverson; Wen-Chih Wu; Gaurav Choudhary; Alan R Morrison Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Noortje van der Bijl; Paul W de Bruin; Jacob Geleijns; Jeroen J Bax; Joanne D Schuijf; Albert de Roos; Lucia J M Kroft Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Cvetan Trpkov; Alexei Savtchenko; Zhiying Liang; Patrick Feng; Danielle A Southern; Stephen B Wilton; Matthew T James; Erin Feil; Ilias Mylonas; Robert J H Miller Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2021-06-19