Literature DB >> 17674003

Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness images on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT.

Jun Horiguchi1, Noriaki Matsuura, Hideya Yamamoto, Nobuhiko Hirai, Masao Kiguchi, Chikako Fujioka, Toshiro Kitagawa, Nobuoki Kohno, Katsuhide Ito.   

Abstract

High reproducibility on coronary artery calcium scoring is a key requirement in monitoring the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The purpose of this prospective study is to assess the reproducibility of 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness images on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT with respect to 2.5-mm-thickness images on spiral overlapping reconstruction. One hundred patients suspected of coronary artery disease were scanned twice repeatedly, both on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered step-and-shoot and retrospective electrocardiograph-gated spiral scans. Using 1.25-mm-thickness collimation, 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness image sets on prospective scans and 2.5-mm-thickness image sets with 1.25-mm increment (overlapping) on retrospective scans were obtained. Coronary artery calcium scores, interscan variability and interobserver variability were evaluated. The mean interscan variability in coronary artery calcium measurement on 1.25-mm prospective/2.5-mm prospective/2.5-mm overlapping retrospective scans were Agatston: 10%/18%/12%, volume: 10%/12%/10% and mass: 8%/13%/11% for observer 1 and Agatston: 8%/14%/10%, volume: 7%/9%/10% and mass: 7%/10%/9% for observer 2, respectively. The mean interobserver variability was 5% to 14%. In conclusion, prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT using the 1.25-mm prospective scan shows the lowest variability. The 2.5-mm prospective scan on volume or mass scoring shows variability of around 10%, comparable to 2.5-mm-thickness spiral overlapping reconstruction images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17674003     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0734-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

1.  Overlapping cross-sections significantly improve the reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements by electron beam tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  S Achenbach; F Meissner; D Ropers; K Pohle; M Kusus; G Muschiol; W G Daniel; W Moshage
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart.

Authors:  Richard L Morin; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Progression of coronary artery calcification: a pilot study.

Authors:  J E Maher; L F Bielak; J A Raz; P F Sheedy; R S Schwartz; P A Peyser
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT.

Authors:  Andreas F Kopp; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christoph Becker; Stephen Schröder; Martin Heuschmid; Axel Küttner; Ronald Kuzo; Claus D Claussen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Timing on 16-slice scanner and implications for 64-slice cardiac CT: do you start scanning immediately after breath hold?

Authors:  Jun Horiguchi; Yun Shen; Nobuhiko Hirai; Hideya Yamamoto; Yuji Akiyama; Minoru Ishifuro; Hideaki Kakizawa; Masashi Hieda; Toshihiro Tachikake; Noriaki Matsuura; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  [Detection and quantification of coronary calcification: an update].

Authors:  R Fischbach; W Heindel
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2000-05

8.  Comparison of serial quantitative evaluation of calcified coronary artery plaque by ultrafast computed tomography in persons with and without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  W R Janowitz; A S Agatston; M Viamonte
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Sensitivity to detect small coronary artery calcium lesions with varying slice thickness using electron beam tomography.

Authors:  Songshou Mao; Janis Child; Sivi Carson; Steve C K Liu; Ronald J Oudiz; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: calcification or noise?

Authors:  L F Bielak; R B Kaufmann; P P Moll; C H McCollough; R S Schwartz; P F Sheedy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Reproducibility of coronary artery calcium measurements using 0.8-mm-thickness 256-slice coronary CT.

Authors:  Soe Hee Ann; Jae Hee Kim; Nam Du Ha; Seong Hoon Choi; Scot Garg; Gillian Balbir Singh; Eun-Seok Shin
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Effect of heart rate and body mass index on the interscan and interobserver variability of coronary artery calcium scoring at prospective ECG-triggered 64-slice CT.

Authors:  Jun Horiguchi; Noriaki Matsuura; Hideya Yamamoto; Masao Kiguchi; Chikako Fujioka; Toshiro Kitagawa; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 4.  Calcification in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Nikolaos Alexopoulos; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Assessment of coronary artery calcium by using volumetric 320-row multi-detector computed tomography: comparison of 0.5 mm with 3.0 mm slice reconstructions.

Authors:  Noortje van der Bijl; Paul W de Bruin; Jacob Geleijns; Jeroen J Bax; Joanne D Schuijf; Albert de Roos; Lucia J M Kroft
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.