Literature DB >> 17268802

Evaluation of the influence of acquisition and reconstruction parameters for 16-row multidetector CT on coronary calcium scoring using a stationary and dynamic cardiac phantom.

Philipp G C Begemann1, Udo van Stevendaal, Ralph Koester, Andreas H Mahnken, Andreas Koops, Gerhard Adam, Michael Grass, Claus Nolte-Ernsting.   

Abstract

A calcium-scoring phantom with hydroxyapatite-filled cylindrical holes (0.5 to 4 mm) was used. High-resolution scans were performed for an accuracy baseline. The phantom was mounted to a moving heart phantom. Non-moving data with the implementation of an ECG-signal were acquired for different pitches (0.2/0.3), heart rates (60/80/95 bpm) and collimations (16 x 0.75/16 x 1.5 mm). Images were reconstructed with a cone-beam multi-cycle algorithm at a standard thickness/increment of 3 mm/1.5 mm and the thinnest possible thickness (0.8/0.4 and 2/1). Subsequently, ECG-gated moving calcium-scoring phantom data were acquired. The calcium volume and Agatston score were measured. The temporal resolution and reconstruction cycles were calculated. High-resolution scans determine the calcium volume with a high accuracy (mean overestimation, 0.8%). In the non-moving measurements, the volume underestimation ranged from about 6% (16 x 0.75 mm; 0.8/0.4 mm) to nearly 25% (16 x 1.5 mm; 3/1.5 mm). Moving scans showed increased measurement errors depending on the reconstructed RR interval, collimation, pitch, heart rate and gantry rotation time. Also, a correlation with the temporal resolution could be found. The reliability of calcium-scoring results can be improved with the use of a narrower collimation, a lower pitch and the reconstruction of thinner images, resulting in higher patient doses. The choice of the correct cardiac phase within the RR interval is essential to minimize measurement errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17268802     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0564-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  35 in total

1.  Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT.

Authors:  B Ohnesorge; T Flohr; R Fischbach; A F Kopp; A Knez; S Schröder; U J Schöpf; A Crispin; E Klotz; M F Reiser; C R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Stefan Ulzheimer; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Elastomechanics of the ventricles: development of a phantom and results of simulation].

Authors:  W Sediono; O Dössel
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.411

4.  Improving mass measurement of coronary artery calcification using threshold correction and thin collimation in multi-detector row computed tomography: in vitro experiment.

Authors:  Cheng Hong; Thomas K Pilgram; Fang Zhu; Bonnie N Joe; Dwight A Towler; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 16-MDCT with retrospective reconstruction.

Authors:  Jun Horiguchi; Hideya Yamamoto; Yuji Akiyama; Nobuhiko Hirai; Kazushi Marukawa; Hiroshi Fukuda; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  [Calcium scoring and coronary angiography performed with multislice spiral CT -- clinical experience].

Authors:  C Weber; P Begemann; U Wedegärtner; T Meinertz; G Adam
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2005-01

8.  Automatic phase determination for retrospectively gated cardiac CT.

Authors:  R Manzke; Th Köhler; T Nielsen; D Hawkes; M Grass
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Coronary artery calcium score: influence of reconstruction interval at 16-detector row CT with retrospective electrocardiographic gating.

Authors:  Thomas Schlosser; Peter Hunold; Axel Schmermund; Hilmar Kühl; Kai-Uwe Waltering; Jörg F Debatin; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Is coronary artery calcium mass related to Agatston score?

Authors:  Cheng Hong; Thomas K Pilgram; Fang Zhu; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Coronary artery calcium scoring and its impact on the clinical practice in the era of multidetector CT.

Authors:  Jongmin Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Computerized method for evaluating diagnostic image quality of calcified plaque images in cardiac CT: validation on a physical dynamic cardiac phantom.

Authors:  Martin King; Zachary Rodgers; Maryellen L Giger; Dianna M E Bardo; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification.

Authors:  Akira Kurata; Anoeshka Dharampal; Admir Dedic; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Koen Nieman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.