Literature DB >> 28688634

Predictors of mortality in the elderly after open repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Vijaya T Daniel1, Jason T Wiseman2, Julie Flahive3, Heena P Santry4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the U.S. population ages and the number of emergent surgical repairs for perforated peptic ulcer disease (PUD) rise, contemporary national data evaluating operative outcomes for open surgical repair for perforated PUD among the elderly are lacking.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2007-2014) was queried for patients ≥65 y who underwent open surgical repair for perforated PUD. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-d postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Overall, 2131 patients underwent open surgical repair for perforated PUD. Among those who died, more used steroids preoperatively (15% versus 9%, P = 0.001) and fewer were independent preoperatively (55% versus 83%, P < 0.0001) compared to those who were alive 30-d postoperatively. Common postoperative complications were septic shock (15%) and pneumonia (12%). The overall 30-d mortality rate was 17.7%, with more deaths in subsequent decades of life (65-75 y 13% versus 75-84 y 18% versus >85 y 24%, P < 0.0001). After adjustment for other factors, mortality was significantly associated with older age (85+ versus 65-74 y) (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8, 1.7), dependent functional status preoperatively ([OR], 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2, 0.3), and American Society of Anesthesiologist classification ≥4 (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.4, 4.3).
CONCLUSIONS: At U.S. hospitals, open surgical repair, the accepted treatment of perforated PUD, among the elderly is associated with significant 30-d morbidity and mortality rates that are unacceptably high in our contemporary era. Furthermore, mortality rates are associated with older age. Therefore, as the elderly population continues to increase in the United States, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative measures must be taken to reduce this high morbidity and mortality rates.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Outcomes; Peptic ulcer disease; Surgical repair

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28688634      PMCID: PMC6889865          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  29 in total

1.  Time trends of physician visits and treatment patterns of peptic ulcer disease in the United States.

Authors:  S Munnangi; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-07-14

Review 2.  Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis.

Authors:  C Svanes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  What is meant by high-risk informed consent?

Authors:  James W Jones; Laurence B McCullough
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Process of care and outcomes for elderly patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer disease: results from a quality improvement project.

Authors:  J Brock; A Sauaia; D Ahnen; W Marine; W Schluter; B R Stevens; J D Scinto; H Karp; D Bratzler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 Oct 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Long-term trends in Medicare payments in the last year of life.

Authors:  Gerald F Riley; James D Lubitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Current features of peptic ulcer disease in Finland: incidence of surgery, hospital admissions and mortality for the disease during the past twenty-five years.

Authors:  H Paimela; L Paimela; R Myllykangas-Luosujärvi; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Surgical therapy of peptic ulcers in the 21st century: more common than you think.

Authors:  George A Sarosi; Kshama R Jaiswal; Fiemu E Nwariaku; Massiamo Asolati; Jason B Fleming; Thomas Anthony
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Failure to rescue in safety-net hospitals: availability of hospital resources and differences in performance.

Authors:  Elliot Wakeam; Nathanael D Hevelone; Rebecca Maine; Jabaris Swain; Stuart A Lipsitz; Samuel R G Finlayson; Stanley W Ashley; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Trends in hospital admission, perforation and mortality of peptic ulcer in Hong Kong from 1970 to 1980.

Authors:  J Koo; Y K Ngan; S K Lam
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Preoperative Frailty Assessment and Outcomes at 6 Months or Later in Older Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dae Hyun Kim; Caroline A Kim; Sebastian Placide; Lewis A Lipsitz; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  8 in total

1.  Upper Gastrointestinal Perforations: A Possible Danger of Antibiotic Overuse.

Authors:  Vijaya T Daniel; Stephanie Francalancia; Nili S Amir; M Didem Ayturk; Stacy B Sanders; Jonathan R Wisler; Courtney E Collins; Doyle V Ward; Catarina I Kiefe; Beth A McCormick; Heena P Santry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Evaluation of the Antiulcer Activity of Methanolic Extract and Solvent Fractions of the Leaves of Calpurnia aurea (Ait.) Benth. (Fabaceae) in Rats.

Authors:  Yared Andargie; Woretaw Sisay; Mulugeta Molla; Alefe Norahun; Pradeep Singh
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  The influence of payor status on outcomes associated with surgical repair of upper gastrointestinal perforations due to peptic ulcer disease in the United States.

Authors:  Vijaya T Daniel; Didem Ayturk; Doyle V Ward; Beth A McCormick; Heena P Santry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders in Older Age.

Authors:  Igor Dumic; Terri Nordin; Mladen Jecmenica; Milica Stojkovic Lalosevic; Tomica Milosavljevic; Tamara Milovanovic
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-17

5.  Evaluation of Antiulcer Activity of 80% Methanol Extract and Solvent Fractions of the Root of Croton macrostachyus Hocsht: Ex Del. (Euphorbiaceae) in Rodents.

Authors:  Alefe Norahun Mekonnen; Seyfe Asrade Atnafie; Mohammedbirhan A Wahab Atta
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Analysis of risk factors affecting the development of peptic ulcer perforation: case-control study.

Authors:  Sami Akbulut; Ali Riza Caliskan; Hasan Saritas; Khaled Demyati; Yilmaz Bilgic; Selver Unsal; Cemalettin Koc; Sezai Yilmaz
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-25

7.  Construction and efficacy evaluation of an early warning scoring system for septic shock in patients with digestive tract perforation: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Peiling Chen; Jingqi Gao; Jun Li; Rongguo Yu; Ling Wang; Fangqin Xue; Xiaochun Zheng; Ling Gao; Xiuling Shang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-13

Review 8.  Review of Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Evidence of Some Ethiopian Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used for Peptic Ulcer Disease Treatment.

Authors:  Tesfaye Yimer Tadesse; Mulugeta Molla Zeleke; Samuel Berihun Dagnew
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-09-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.