Literature DB >> 16211523

New York-Structural GenomiX Research Consortium (NYSGXRC): a large scale center for the protein structure initiative.

Jeffrey B Bonanno1, Steven C Almo, Anne Bresnick, Mark R Chance, Andras Fiser, S Swaminathan, J Jiang, F William Studier, Lawrence Shapiro, Christopher D Lima, Theresa M Gaasterland, Andrej Sali, Kevin Bain, Ingeborg Feil, Xia Gao, Don Lorimer, Aurora Ramos, J Michael Sauder, Steven R Wasserman, Spencer Emtage, Kevin L D'Amico, Stephen K Burley.   

Abstract

Structural GenomiX, Inc. (SGX), four New York area institutions, and two University of California schools have formed the New York Structural GenomiX Research Consortium (NYSGXRC), an industrial/academic Research Consortium that exploits individual core competencies to support all aspects of the NIH-NIGMS funded Protein Structure Initiative (PSI), including protein family classification and target selection, generation of protein for biophysical analyses, sample preparation for structural studies, structure determination and analyses, and dissemination of results. At the end of the PSI Pilot Study Phase (PSI-1), the NYSGXRC will be capable of producing 100-200 experimentally determined protein structures annually. All Consortium activities can be scaled to increase production capacity significantly during the Production Phase of the PSI (PSI-2). The Consortium utilizes both centralized and de-centralized production teams with clearly defined deliverables and hand-off procedures that are supported by a web-based target/sample tracking system (SGX Laboratory Information Data Management System, LIMS, and NYSGXRC Internal Consortium Experimental Database, ICE-DB). Consortium management is provided by an Executive Committee, which is composed of the PI and all Co-PIs. Progress to date is tracked on a publicly available Consortium web site (http://www.nysgxrc.org) and all DNA/protein reagents and experimental protocols are distributed freely from the New York City Area institutions. In addition to meeting the requirements of the Pilot Study Phase and preparing for the Production Phase of the PSI, the NYSGXRC aims to develop modular technologies that are transferable to structural biology laboratories in both academe and industry. The NYSGXRC PI and Co-PIs intend the PSI to have a transforming effect on the disciplines of X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy of biological macromolecules. Working with other PSI-funded Centers, the NYSGXRC seeks to create the structural biology laboratory of the future. Herein, we present an overview of the organization of the NYSGXRC and describe progress toward development of a high-throughput Gene-->Structure platform. An analysis of current and projected consortium metrics reflects progress to date and delineates opportunities for further technology development.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16211523     DOI: 10.1007/s10969-005-6827-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics        ISSN: 1345-711X


  6 in total

1.  Tools for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis.

Authors:  Narayanan Eswar; Bino John; Nebojsa Mirkovic; Andras Fiser; Valentin A Ilyin; Ursula Pieper; Ashley C Stuart; Marc A Marti-Renom; M S Madhusudhan; Bozidar Yerkovich; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Optimization of protein production in mammalian cells with a coexpressed fluorescent marker.

Authors:  Filippo Mancia; Saurabh D Patel; Michael W Rajala; Philipp E Scherer; Adriana Nemes; Ira Schieren; Wayne A Hendrickson; Lawrence Shapiro
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Probing the solution structure of the DNA-binding protein Max by a combination of proteolysis and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  S L Cohen; A R Ferré-D'Amaré; S K Burley; B T Chait
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Recognition of polyadenylate RNA by the poly(A)-binding protein.

Authors:  R C Deo; J B Bonanno; N Sonenberg; S K Burley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures.

Authors:  F William Studier
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.650

6.  Disulfide-dependent multimeric assembly of resistin family hormones.

Authors:  Saurabh D Patel; Michael W Rajala; Luciano Rossetti; Philipp E Scherer; Lawrence Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Modeling of protein binary complexes using structural mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  J K Amisha Kamal; Mark R Chance
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  The application of FAST-NMR for the identification of novel drug discovery targets.

Authors:  Robert Powers; Kelly A Mercier; Jennifer C Copeland
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 3.  The impact of extremophiles on structural genomics (and vice versa).

Authors:  Francis E Jenney; Michael W W Adams
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Characterization of metalloproteins by high-throughput X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Wuxian Shi; Marco Punta; Jen Bohon; J Michael Sauder; Rhijuta D'Mello; Mike Sullivan; John Toomey; Don Abel; Marco Lippi; Andrea Passerini; Paolo Frasconi; Stephen K Burley; Burkhard Rost; Mark R Chance
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Anomalous diffraction in crystallographic phase evaluation.

Authors:  Wayne A Hendrickson
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Characterization of a glycoside hydrolase family 78 α-l-rhamnosidase from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 and identification of functional residues.

Authors:  Binchun Li; Yaru Ji; Yanqin Li; Guobin Ding
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Target selection and annotation for the structural genomics of the amidohydrolase and enolase superfamilies.

Authors:  Ursula Pieper; Ranyee Chiang; Jennifer J Seffernick; Shoshana D Brown; Margaret E Glasner; Libusha Kelly; Narayanan Eswar; J Michael Sauder; Jeffrey B Bonanno; Subramanyam Swaminathan; Stephen K Burley; Xiaojing Zheng; Mark R Chance; Steven C Almo; John A Gerlt; Frank M Raushel; Matthew P Jacobson; Patricia C Babbitt; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-02-14

8.  Getting a grip on complexes.

Authors:  Yan Nie; Cristina Viola; Christoph Bieniossek; Simon Trowitzsch; Lakshmi Sumitra Vijay-Achandran; Maxime Chaillet; Frederic Garzoni; Imre Berger
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  The structure of a Streptomyces avermitilis α-L-rhamnosidase reveals a novel carbohydrate-binding module CBM67 within the six-domain arrangement.

Authors:  Zui Fujimoto; Adam Jackson; Mari Michikawa; Tomoko Maehara; Mitsuru Momma; Bernard Henrissat; Harry J Gilbert; Satoshi Kaneko
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  High-throughput crystallography for structural genomics.

Authors:  Andrzej Joachimiak
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.