Mohammad Zarrabian1, Andrew Bidos1, Caroline Fanti1, Barry Young1, Brian Drew1, David Puskas1, Raja Rampersaud1. 1. From the Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. (Zarrabian); the Toronto Western Hospital University Health Network, Toronto, Ont. (Bidos); the Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ont. (Fanti, Puskas); Absolute Chiropractic, Hamilton, Ont. (Young); the Division of Orthopedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Drew); the Arthritis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Rampersaud); and the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Rampersaud).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics (ISAEC) were developed to improve primary care assessment, education and management of patients with persistent or recurrent low back pain-related symptoms. This study aims to determine the effect of ISAEC on access for surgical assessment, referral appropriateness and efficiency for patients meeting a priori referral criteria in rural, urban and metropolitan settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospective data from networked ISAEC clinics in Thunder Bay, Hamilton and Toronto, Ontario. For patients meeting surgical referral criteria, wait times for surgical assessment, surgical referral-related magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and appropriateness of referral were recorded. RESULTS: Overall 422 patients, representing 10% of all ISAEC patients in the study period, were referred for surgical assessment. The average wait times for surgical assessment were 5.4, 4.3 and 2.2 weeks at the metropolitan, urban and rural centres, respectively. Referral MRI usage for the group decreased by 31%. Of the patients referred for formal surgical assessment, 80% had leg-dominant pain and 96% were deemed appropriate surgical referrals. CONCLUSION: Contrary to geographic concentration of health care resources in metropolitan settings, the greatest decrease in wait times was achieved in the rural setting. A networked, shared-cared model of care for patients with low back pain-related symptoms significantly improved access for surgical assessment despite varying geographic practice settings and barriers. The greatest reductions were noted in the rural setting. In addition, significant improvements in referral appropriateness and efficiency were achieved compared with historical reports across all sites.
BACKGROUND: The Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics (ISAEC) were developed to improve primary care assessment, education and management of patients with persistent or recurrent low back pain-related symptoms. This study aims to determine the effect of ISAEC on access for surgical assessment, referral appropriateness and efficiency for patients meeting a priori referral criteria in rural, urban and metropolitan settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospective data from networked ISAEC clinics in Thunder Bay, Hamilton and Toronto, Ontario. For patients meeting surgical referral criteria, wait times for surgical assessment, surgical referral-related magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and appropriateness of referral were recorded. RESULTS: Overall 422 patients, representing 10% of all ISAEC patients in the study period, were referred for surgical assessment. The average wait times for surgical assessment were 5.4, 4.3 and 2.2 weeks at the metropolitan, urban and rural centres, respectively. Referral MRI usage for the group decreased by 31%. Of the patients referred for formal surgical assessment, 80% had leg-dominant pain and 96% were deemed appropriate surgical referrals. CONCLUSION: Contrary to geographic concentration of health care resources in metropolitan settings, the greatest decrease in wait times was achieved in the rural setting. A networked, shared-cared model of care for patients with low back pain-related symptoms significantly improved access for surgical assessment despite varying geographic practice settings and barriers. The greatest reductions were noted in the rural setting. In addition, significant improvements in referral appropriateness and efficiency were achieved compared with historical reports across all sites.
Authors: Jason W Busse; John J Riva; Jennifer V Nash; Sandy Hsu; Charles G Fisher; Eugene K Wai; David Brunarski; Brian Drew; Jeffery A Quon; Stephen D Walter; Paul B Bishop; Raja Rampersaud Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Kai-Uwe LewandrowskI; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2020-12
Authors: Peter Cram; Bruce E Landon; John Matelski; Vicki Ling; Anthony V Perruccio; J Michael Paterson; Y Raja Rampersaud Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Fan Jiang; Jamie R F Wilson; Jetan H Badhiwala; Carlo Santaguida; Michael H Weber; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2020-01-06
Authors: Donald R Murphy; Brian Justice; Christopher G Bise; Michael Timko; Joel M Stevans; Michael J Schneider Journal: Chiropr Man Therap Date: 2022-02-09
Authors: Neil Betteridge; Connie Camilleri; Linda Stoyanoff; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Josef de Guzman; Souzi Makri; Lillian Mwaniki Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.098