Literature DB >> 21833820

Evaluation of the appropriateness criteria for coronary computed tomography angiography in an academic medical center in a developing country: comparison of the 2006 and 2010 criteria.

Katia El Sibai1, Salam Itani, Ali Rabah, Mukbil Hourani, Habib A Dakik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study are to analyze the risk profile and evaluate the appropriateness of patient referral to coronary CT angiography in a new MSCT laboratory in an academic medical center in a developing country. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 100 consecutive patients (mean age 53 ± 13 years, 83% males) who were referred to the new 64 slice MSCT laboratory at the American University of Beirut between July 2008 and July 2009. 52% of patients had chest pain and 48% were asymptomatic. By the 2006 ACCF criteria, only 8% of the referrals fitted the "Appropriate" criteria, 49% were "Inappropriate", and 43% were "Uncertain". The percentage of "Appropriate" indications increased from 8% by the 2006 criteria to 38% by the 2010 ACCF criteria. Framingham risk score (FRS) calculation showed a substantial percentage (46%) of patients to be at low risk, with 32% being at intermediate risk, and 22% at high risk. The prevalence of high calcium score (>400) (0% vs 22%, vs 27%, P < .001) and of obstructive CAD (4% vs 23% vs 40%, P < .001) increased steadily across the low, intermediate, and high FRS groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in the percentage of "Appropriate" indications for MSCT when comparing the 2010 to the 2006 ACCF appropriateness criteria. However, in spite of that, there was still significant deviation from the ACCF appropriateness criteria among patients referred for coronary CT angiography in this new MSCT laboratory in a developing country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21833820     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9437-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  20 in total

1.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Allen J Taylor; Manuel Cerqueira; John McB Hodgson; Daniel Mark; James Min; Patrick O'Gara; Geoffrey D Rubin; Christopher M Kramer; Daniel Berman; Alan Brown; Farooq A Chaudhry; Ricardo C Cury; Milind Y Desai; Andrew J Einstein; Antoinette S Gomes; Robert Harrington; Udo Hoffmann; Rahul Khare; John Lesser; Christopher McGann; Alan Rosenberg; Robert Schwartz; Marc Shelton; Gerald W Smetana; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Stephan Achenbach; Matthew Budoff; Thomas C Gerber; Bernard Gersh; L David Hillis; W Gregory Hundley; Warren J Manning; Beth Feller Printz; Matthias Stuber; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Relation of Framingham risk score to subclinical atherosclerosis evaluated across three arterial sites.

Authors:  Roksana Karim; Howard N Hodis; Robert Detrano; Chao-Ran Liu; Chi-Hua Liu; Wendy J Mack
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Giuseppe Runza; Eugène P McFadden; Timo Baks; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data.

Authors:  Alan D Lopez; Colin D Mathers; Majid Ezzati; Dean T Jamison; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Underlying risk factors incrementally add to the standard risk estimate in detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in low- and intermediate-risk middle-aged asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Milind Y Desai; Khurram Nasir; Joel B Braunstein; John A Rumberger; Wendy S Post; Matthew J Budoff; Roger S Blumenthal
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Comparison of the coronary calcium score with the estimated coronary risk.

Authors:  Jidong Sung; Su Jin Lim; Yeonhyeon Choe; Yoon-Ho Choi; Moon Kyu Lee; Sang Hoon Lee; Kyung Pyo Hong; Jeong Euy Park
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.439

9.  Relation between Framingham risk categories and the presence of functionally relevant coronary lesions as determined on multislice computed tomography and stress testing.

Authors:  Gaetano Nucifora; Joanne D Schuijf; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Roxana Djaberi; Ernst E van der Wall; Albert de Roos; Arthur J H A Scholte; Martin J Schalij; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Association of coronary atherosclerosis detected by multislice computed tomography and traditional risk-factor assessment.

Authors:  Deepu Nair; Thomas P Carrigan; Ronan J Curtin; Zoran B Popovic; Stacie Kuzmiak; Paul Schoenhagen; Scott D Flamm; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

1.  Non-invasive imaging in suspected coronary artery disease: Choosing the right test from the first time.

Authors:  Habib A Dakik
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging from a tertiary referral center in the Middle East.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Hussain Isma'eel; Fadi El Merhi; Tony Assad; Mukbil Hourani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.