| Literature DB >> 16203283 |
Francesca Maria Carozzi1, Annarosa Del Mistro, Massimo Confortini, Cristina Sani, Donella Puliti, Rossana Trevisan, Laura De Marco, Anna Gillio Tos, Salvatore Girlando, Paolo Dalla Palma, Antonella Pellegrini, Maria Luisa Schiboni, Paola Crucitti, Paola Pierotti, Alberta Vignato, Guglielmo Ronco.
Abstract
Within a large Italian randomized trial on new technologies for cervical cancer screening involving 7 laboratories with different levels of experience, an intralaboratory and interlaboratory quality control program for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing by Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Digene, Gaithersburg, MD) was implemented. To monitor the hybridization and detection steps, target samples containing purified, concentration-defined, HPV DNA were introduced in each test run. Only 3 of 1,024 showed a mistake in a positive vs negative classification with a 1 relative light unit (RLU)/positive control specimen (PC) ratio cutoff. To monitor the preanalytic steps (particularly denaturation), blinded specimens (33 collected in PreservCyt (Cytyc, Boxborough, MA) and 36 in Specimen Transport Medium (STM, Digene) were centrally prepared, divided into aliquots, and sent to each laboratory. The multiple-rater scores for negative (<1 RLU/PC), low-positive (1 to <11 RLU/PC), and high-positive (> or =11 RLU/PC) samples, respectively, were 0.91, 0.60, and 0.69 with PreservCyt and 0.93, 0.87, and 0.90 with STM. Our data showed high reliability and reproducibility with HC2, with values higher for STM than ThinPrep (Cytyc) samples.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16203283 DOI: 10.1309/84E5-WHJQ-HK83-BGQD
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Clin Pathol ISSN: 0002-9173 Impact factor: 2.493