Literature DB >> 24574284

Interlaboratory reproducibility and proficiency testing within the human papillomavirus cervical cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain.

R Ibáñez1, M Félez-Sánchez, J M Godínez, C Guardià, E Caballero, R Juve, N Combalia, B Bellosillo, D Cuevas, J Moreno-Crespi, L Pons, J Autonell, C Gutierrez, J Ordi, S de Sanjosé, I G Bravo.   

Abstract

In Catalonia, a screening protocol for cervical cancer, including human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing using the Digene Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay, was implemented in 2006. In order to monitor interlaboratory reproducibility, a proficiency testing (PT) survey of the HPV samples was launched in 2008. The aim of this study was to explore the repeatability of the HC2 assay's performance. Participating laboratories provided 20 samples annually, 5 randomly chosen samples from each of the following relative light unit (RLU) intervals: <0.5, 0.5 to 0.99, 1 to 9.99, and ≥10. Kappa statistics were used to determine the agreement levels between the original and the PT readings. The nature and origin of the discrepant results were calculated by bootstrapping. A total of 946 specimens were retested. The kappa values were 0.91 for positive/negative categorical classification and 0.79 for the four RLU intervals studied. Sample retesting yielded systematically lower RLU values than the original test (P<0.005), independently of the time elapsed between the two determinations (median, 53 days), possibly due to freeze-thaw cycles. The probability for a sample to show clinically discrepant results upon retesting was a function of the RLU value; samples with RLU values in the 0.5 to 5 interval showed 10.80% probability to yield discrepant results (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.86 to 14.33) compared to 0.85% probability for samples outside this interval (95% CI, 0.17 to 1.69). Globally, the HC2 assay shows high interlaboratory concordance. We have identified differential confidence thresholds and suggested the guidelines for interlaboratory PT in the future, as analytical quality assessment of HPV DNA detection remains a central component of the screening program for cervical cancer prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24574284      PMCID: PMC3993685          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00100-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

1.  Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.

Authors:  P Brennan; A Silman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-06

2.  Cross-sectional comparison of an automated hybrid capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program.

Authors:  A T Hesselink; N W J Bulkmans; J Berkhof; A T Lorincz; C J L M Meijer; P J F Snijders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide.

Authors:  J M Walboomers; M V Jacobs; M M Manos; F X Bosch; J A Kummer; K V Shah; P J Snijders; J Peto; C J Meijer; N Muñoz
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  Reproducibility of HPV DNA Testing by Hybrid Capture 2 in a Screening Setting.

Authors:  Francesca Maria Carozzi; Annarosa Del Mistro; Massimo Confortini; Cristina Sani; Donella Puliti; Rossana Trevisan; Laura De Marco; Anna Gillio Tos; Salvatore Girlando; Paolo Dalla Palma; Antonella Pellegrini; Maria Luisa Schiboni; Paola Crucitti; Paola Pierotti; Alberta Vignato; Guglielmo Ronco
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  A critical assessment of screening methods for cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  R Sankaranarayanan; L Gaffikin; M Jacob; J Sellors; S Robles
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Interlaboratory reliability of Hybrid Capture 2.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Cosette M Wheeler; Diane Solomon; Mark Schiffman; Cheri L Peyton
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Nubia Muñoz; F Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé; Rolando Herrero; Xavier Castellsagué; Keerti V Shah; Peter J F Snijders; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Pontus Naucler; Walter Ryd; Sven Törnberg; Anders Strand; Göran Wadell; Kristina Elfgren; Thomas Rådberg; Björn Strander; Bo Johansson; Ola Forslund; Bengt-Göran Hansson; Eva Rylander; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Guglielmo Ronco; Joakim Dillner; K Miriam Elfström; Sara Tunesi; Peter J F Snijders; Marc Arbyn; Henry Kitchener; Nereo Segnan; Clare Gilham; Paolo Giorgi-Rossi; Johannes Berkhof; Julian Peto; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Screening of cervical cancer in Catalonia 2006-2012.

Authors:  Silvia de Sanjosé; Raquel Ibáñez; Vanesa Rodríguez-Salés; Mercè Peris; Esther Roura; Mireia Diaz; Aureli Torné; Dolors Costa; Yolanda Canet; Gemma Falguera; Maria Alejo; Josep Alfons Espinàs; F Xavier Bosch
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-04-29

2.  Protecting the underscreened women in developed countries: the value of HPV test.

Authors:  Raquel Ibáñez; Josefina Autonell; Montserrat Sardà; Nayade Crespo; Pilar Pique; Amparo Pascual; Clara Martí; Montserrat Fibla; Cristina Gutiérrez; Belén Lloveras; Judit Moreno-Crespi; Anna Torrent; Núria Baixeras; María Alejo; Francesc Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Poor Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance and False Negatives. A Call for Organized Screening.

Authors:  Marta Castillo; Aurora Astudillo; Omar Clavero; Julio Velasco; Raquel Ibáñez; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.