Literature DB >> 23804385

Clinical impact of the analytical specificity of the hybrid capture 2 test: data from the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer (NTCC) study.

Anna Gillio-Tos1, Laura De Marco, Francesca Maria Carozzi, Annarosa Del Mistro, Salvatore Girlando, Elena Burroni, Helena Frayle-Salamanca, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Paola Pierotti, Guglielmo Ronco.   

Abstract

The Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test targets 13 human papillomavirus (HPV) types. Here, cross-reactivity with non-HC2-targeted HPV types is described. We aimed to define the proportion of HC2-positive women who had negative results with HC2-targeted HPV types and estimate its determinants and impact on women's health management. The New Technologies for Cervical Cancer (NTCC) trial was followed in two predetermined phases. Women in the experimental arm were tested for the presence of HPV DNA by HC2 following a sample collection in PreservCyt (first phase) or Digene specimen transport medium (STM) (second phase). HPV genotyping was performed on DNA samples from HC2-positive women by PCR with GP5(+)/GP6(+) primers and reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization. Untyped samples were submitted to direct sequencing or restriction fragment length polymorphism. Multivariate logistic regression analysis estimated the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) between the presence of HC2-targeted types and age, viral load, and type of transport medium. Out of 2,920 HC2-positive samples, 2,310 (79.1%) were positive on RLB for HC2-targeted types, 396 were positive (13.6%) for only non-HC2-targeted types (mostly represented by HPV-53, HPV-66, and HPV-70), and in 214 (7.33%) samples, no HPV types were detected. The probability of detecting HC2-targeted types increased with increasing viral load expressed as the relative light unit/positive-control specimen ratio (RLU/PC) (OR for unitary increase of log RLU/PC, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30 to 1.42) and with STM versus PreservCyt (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.84). If only the samples containing HC2-targeted types tested positive, the positive predictive value (PPV) would have increased from 7.0% (95% CI, 6.1% to 8.0%) to 8.4% (95% CI, 7.3 to 9.6), although 4.9% (95% CI, 2.4% to 8.8%) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2(+) (CIN2(+)) cases would have been missed. In conclusion, STM use and an increased cutoff would reduce the HC2 analytical false-positive rate and increase the positive predictive value for high-grade CIN. The gain in clinical sensitivity by detecting non-HC2-targeted HPV types is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804385      PMCID: PMC3754632          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01047-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  37 in total

1.  Detection of high-risk HPV types by the hybrid capture 2 test.

Authors:  G Terry; L Ho; P Londesborough; J Cuzick; I Mielzynska-Lohnas; A Lorincz
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.327

2.  Hybrid Capture II HPV Test detects at least 15 human papillomavirus genotypes not included in its current high-risk probe cocktail.

Authors:  Mario Poljak; Irena J Marin; Katja Seme; Adriana Vince
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.168

3.  The 2010 global proficiency study of human papillomavirus genotyping in vaccinology.

Authors:  Carina Eklund; Ola Forslund; Keng-Ling Wallin; Tiequn Zhou; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Hybrid capture-II and LCR-E7 PCR assays for HPV typing in cervical cytologic samples.

Authors:  H Yamazaki; T Sasagawa; W Basha; T Segawa; M Inoue
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Detection and quantitation of human papillomavirus DNA in the plasma of patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Seung Myung Dong; Sara I Pai; Seo-Hee Rha; Allan Hildesheim; Robert J Kurman; Peter E Schwartz; Rodrigue Mortel; Larry McGowan; Mitchell D Greenberg; Willard A Barnes; David Sidransky
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  A comparison of a prototype PCR assay and hybrid capture 2 for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus DNA in women with equivocal or mildly abnormal papanicolaou smears.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Cosette M Wheeler; Abhijit Dasgupta; Diane Solomon; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  GP5+/6+ PCR followed by reverse line blot analysis enables rapid and high-throughput identification of human papillomavirus genotypes.

Authors:  Adriaan J C van den Brule; René Pol; Nathalie Fransen-Daalmeijer; Leo M Schouls; Chris J L M Meijer; Peter J F Snijders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Restricted cross-reactivity of hybrid capture 2 with nononcogenic human papillomavirus types.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Robert D Burk; Sholom Wacholder; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; M Concepcion Bratti; Mark E Sherman; Attila Lorincz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  The carcinogenicity of human papillomavirus types reflects viral evolution.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Rolando Herrero; Rob Desalle; Allan Hildesheim; Sholom Wacholder; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Maria C Bratti; Mark E Sherman; Jorge Morales; Diego Guillen; Mario Alfaro; Martha Hutchinson; Thomas C Wright; Diane Solomon; Zigui Chen; John Schussler; Philip E Castle; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  Comparison of PCR- and hybrid capture-based human papillomavirus detection systems using multiple cervical specimen collection strategies.

Authors:  C L Peyton; M Schiffman; A T Lörincz; W C Hunt; I Mielzynska; C Bratti; S Eaton; A Hildesheim; L A Morera; A C Rodriguez; R Herrero; M E Sherman; C M Wheeler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  10 in total

1.  The changing culture of the microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; Louis Valiquette
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Determinants of Viral Oncogene E6-E7 mRNA Overexpression in a Population-Based Large Sample of Women Infected by High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Types.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Simonetta Bisanzi; Elena Allia; Alessandra Mongia; Francesca Carozzi; Anna Gillio-Tos; Laura De Marco; Guglielmo Ronco; Daniela Gustinucci; Annarosa Del Mistro; Helena Frayle; Anna Iossa; Giulia Fantacci; Giampaolo Pompeo; Elena Cesarini; Simonetta Bulletti; Basilio Passamonti; Martina Rizzi; Maria Gabriella Penon; Alessandra Barca; Maria Benevolo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Cross-reactivity profiles of hybrid capture II, cobas, and APTIMA human papillomavirus assays: split-sample study.

Authors:  Sarah Preisler; Matejka Rebolj; Ditte Møller Ejegod; Elsebeth Lynge; Carsten Rygaard; Jesper Bonde
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Study-based evaluation of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in comparison to the HC2 HR HPV test in women aged ≥30 years using residual LBC ThinPrep specimens.

Authors:  Thomas Iftner; Lisa Wang; Angelika Iftner; Barbara Holz; Juliane Haedicke-Jarboui; Nathalie Iftner; Reinhard von Wasielewski; Peter Martus; Gerd Boehmer
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Methylation analysis and HPV genotyping of self-collected cervical samples from women not responding to screening invitation and review of the literature.

Authors:  Annarosa Del Mistro; Helena Frayle; Martina Rizzi; Gianpiero Fantin; Antonio Ferro; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Emma Altobelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessment of viral methylation levels for high risk HPV types by newly designed consensus primers PCR and pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Anna Gillio-Tos; Valentina Fiano; Chiara Grasso; Morena Trevisan; Silvia Gori; Alessandra Mongia; Laura De Marco; Guglielmo Ronco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A novel sequencing-based vaginal health assay combining self-sampling, HPV detection and genotyping, STI detection, and vaginal microbiome analysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Bik; Sara W Bird; Juan P Bustamante; Luis E Leon; Pamela A Nieto; Kwasi Addae; Víctor Alegría-Mera; Cristian Bravo; Denisse Bravo; Juan P Cardenas; Glenn A Carson; Adam Caughey; Paulo C Covarrubias; José Pérez-Donoso; Graham Gass; Sarah L Gupta; Kira Harman; Donna Marie B Hongo; Juan C Jiménez; Laurens Kraal; Felipe Melis-Arcos; Eduardo H Morales; Amanda Morton; Camila F Navas; Harold Nuñez; Eduardo Olivares; Nicolás Órdenes-Aenishanslins; Francisco J Ossandon; Richard Phan; Raul Pino; Katia Soto-Liebe; Ignacio Varas; Patricia Vera-Wolf; Nathaniel A Walton; Daniel E Almonacid; Audrey D Goddard; Juan A Ugalde; Susan Zneimer; Jessica Richman; Zachary S Apte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A population-based observational study comparing Cervista and Hybrid Capture 2 methods: improved relative specificity of the Cervista assay by increasing its cut-off.

Authors:  Gerd Boehmer; Lisa Wang; Angelika Iftner; Barbara Holz; Juliane Haedicke; Reinhard von Wasielewski; Peter Martus; Thomas Iftner
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  CIN III lesions and regression: retrospective analysis of 635 cases.

Authors:  Melodi Motamedi; Gerd Böhmer; Heinrich H Neumann; Reinhard von Wasielewski
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Human papilloma virus genotyping for the cross-sectional and longitudinal probability of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more.

Authors:  Annarosa Del Mistro; Rachael Adcock; Francesca Carozzi; Anna Gillio-Tos; Laura De Marco; Salvatore Girlando; Raffaella Rizzolo; Helena Frayle; Morena Trevisan; Cristina Sani; Elena Burroni; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Jack Cuzick; Guglielmo Ronco
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 7.396

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.