Literature DB >> 16199537

Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH.

L Rickman1, H Fiegler, C Shaw-Smith, R Nash, V Cirigliano, G Voglino, B L Ng, C Scott, J Whittaker, M Adinolfi, N P Carter, M Bobrow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Karyotype analysis has been the standard method for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis since the 1970s. Although highly reliable, the major limitation remains the requirement for cell culture, resulting in a delay of as much as 14 days to obtaining test results. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) rapidly detect common chromosomal abnormalities but do not provide a genome wide screen for unexpected imbalances. Array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) has the potential to combine the speed of DNA analysis with a large capacity to scan for genomic abnormalities. We have developed a genomic microarray of approximately 600 large insert clones designed to detect aneuploidy, known microdeletion syndromes, and large unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements.
METHODS: This array was tested alongside an array with an approximate resolution of 1 Mb in a blind study of 30 cultured prenatal and postnatal samples with microscopically confirmed unbalanced rearrangements.
RESULTS: At 1 Mb resolution, 22/30 rearrangements were identified, whereas 29/30 aberrations were detected using the custom designed array, owing to the inclusion of specifically chosen clones to give increased resolution at genomic loci clinically implicated in known microdeletion syndromes. Both arrays failed to identify a triploid karyotype. Thirty normal control samples produced no false positive results.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of 30 uncultured prenatal samples showed that array CGH is capable of detecting aneuploidy in DNA isolated from as little as 1 ml of uncultured amniotic fluid; 29/30 samples were correctly diagnosed, the exception being another case of triploidy. These studies demonstrate the potential for array CGH to replace conventional cytogenetics in the great majority of prenatal diagnosis cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199537      PMCID: PMC2563226          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2005.037648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  36 in total

1.  Trends in cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis in the UK: results from UKNEQAS external audit, 1987-1998.

Authors:  J J Waters; K S Waters
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Fully automatic quantification of microarray image data.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain; Taku A Tokuyasu; Antoine M Snijders; Richard Segraves; Donna G Albertson; Daniel Pinkel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  K Mann; S P Fox; S J Abbs; S C Yau; P N Scriven; Z Docherty; C M Ogilvie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones.

Authors:  Heike Fiegler; Philippa Carr; Eleanor J Douglas; Deborah C Burford; Sarah Hunt; Carol E Scott; James Smith; David Vetrie; Patricia Gorman; Ian P M Tomlinson; Nigel P Carter
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms for constitutional chromosomal rearrangements in humans.

Authors:  L G Shaffer; J R Lupski
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Array painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes using DNA microarrays.

Authors:  H Fiegler; S M Gribble; D C Burford; P Carr; E Prigmore; K M Porter; S Clegg; J A Crolla; N R Dennis; P Jacobs; N P Carter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization in clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  Bassem A Bejjani; Aaron P Theisen; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.225

8.  Karyotypes found in the population declared at increased risk of Down syndrome following maternal serum screening.

Authors:  R G Ryall; D Callen; R Cocciolone; A Duvnjak; R Esca; N Frantzis; E M Gjerde; E A Haan; T Hocking; G Sutherland; D W Thomas; F Webb
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 9.  Genomic microarrays in human genetic disease and cancer.

Authors:  Donna G Albertson; Daniel Pinkel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the genomewide detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Lisenka E L M Vissers; Bert B A de Vries; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Irene M Janssen; Ton Feuth; Chik On Choy; Huub Straatman; Walter van der Vliet; Erik H L P G Huys; Anke van Rijk; Dominique Smeets; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Nine V Knoers; Ineke van der Burgt; Pieter J de Jong; Han G Brunner; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  28 in total

1.  The high incidence of STR D21S1446 homozygosity in Han and She populations living in South Eastern China.

Authors:  Jin-Fang Wu; Lu Xia; Yu-Xin Liu; Xin Zhang; Chen Li; Ming-Li Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Prenatal diagnosis of genomic disorders and chromosome abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Francesca Gullotta; Michela Biancolella; Elena Costa; Isabella Colapietro; Anna Maria Nardone; Paolo Molinaro; Adalgisa Pietropolli; Marianovella Narcisi; Cristiana Di Rosa; Giuseppe Novelli
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2007-01

3.  Accurate and reliable high-throughput detection of copy number variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Heike Fiegler; Richard Redon; Dan Andrews; Carol Scott; Robert Andrews; Carol Carder; Richard Clark; Oliver Dovey; Peter Ellis; Lars Feuk; Lisa French; Paul Hunt; Dimitrios Kalaitzopoulos; James Larkin; Lyndal Montgomery; George H Perry; Bob W Plumb; Keith Porter; Rachel E Rigby; Diane Rigler; Armand Valsesia; Cordelia Langford; Sean J Humphray; Stephen W Scherer; Charles Lee; Matthew E Hurles; Nigel P Carter
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Brigitte H W Faas; Ton Feuth; Johan W T Creemers; Hans H Zondervan; Peter F Boekkooi; Rik W P Quartero; Robbert J P Rijnders; Ineke van der Burgt; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow.

Authors:  Malgorzata Srebniak; Marjan Boter; Grétel Oudesluijs; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Govaerts; Diane Van Opstal; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Informed Decision-Making in the Context of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray.

Authors:  Jessica Baker; Cheryl Shuman; David Chitayat; Syed Wasim; Nan Okun; Johannes Keunen; Renee Hofstedter; Rachel Silver
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Ji Hyeon Park; Jung Hoon Woo; Sung Han Shim; Song-Ju Yang; Young Min Choi; Kap-Seok Yang; Dong Hyun Cha
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.103

9.  Genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects: high detection rates by using chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Yan Lu; Mai T Phung; Chad A Shaw; Kim Pham; Sarah E Neil; Ankita Patel; Trilochan Sahoo; Carlos A Bacino; Pawel Stankiewicz; Sung-Hae Lee Kang; Seema Lalani; A Craig Chinault; James R Lupski; Sau W Cheung; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Genome-wide copy number profiling on high-density bacterial artificial chromosomes, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and oligonucleotide microarrays: a platform comparison based on statistical power analysis.

Authors:  Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa; Michael Egmont-Petersen; Irene M Janssen; Dominique Smeets; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.