Literature DB >> 16199008

An evaluation of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology and the hamilton rating scale for depression: a sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression trial report.

A John Rush1, Ira H Bernstein, Madhukar H Trivedi, Thomas J Carmody, Stephen Wisniewski, James C Mundt, Kathy Shores-Wilson, Melanie M Biggs, Ada Woo, Andrew A Nierenberg, Maurizio Fava.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nine DSM-IV-TR criterion symptom domains are evaluated to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) provides an efficient assessment of these domains and is available as a clinician rating (QIDS-C16), a self-report (QIDS-SR16), and in an automated, interactive voice response (IVR) (QIDS-IVR16) telephone system. This report compares the performance of these three versions of the QIDS and the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD17).
METHODS: Data were acquired at baseline and exit from the first treatment step (citalopram) in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial. Outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD who completed all four ratings within +/-2 days were identified from the first 1500 STAR*D subjects. Both item response theory and classical test theory analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: The three methods for obtaining QIDS data produced consistent findings regarding relationships between the nine symptom domains and overall depression, demonstrating interchangeability among the three methods. The HRSD17, while generally satisfactory, rarely utilized the full range of item scores, and evidence suggested multidimensional measurement properties.
CONCLUSIONS: In nonpsychotic MDD outpatients without overt cognitive impairment, clinician assessment of depression severity using either the QIDS-C16 or HRSD17 may be successfully replaced by either the self-report or IVR version of the QIDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16199008      PMCID: PMC2929841          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  34 in total

1.  Clinical guidelines for the treatment of depressive disorders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Methodological aspects in the assessment of severity of depression by the Hamilton Depression Scale.

Authors:  H J Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Unipolar Depressive Disorders, Part 2: Maintenance treatment of major depressive disorder and treatment of chronic depressive disorders and subthreshold depressions.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Peter C Whybrow; Jules Angst; Marcio Versiani; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness.

Authors:  M Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  1967-12

5.  The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  M H Trivedi; A J Rush; H M Ibrahim; T J Carmody; M M Biggs; T Suppes; M L Crismon; K Shores-Wilson; M G Toprac; E B Dennehy; B Witte; T M Kashner
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  An Item Response analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using shared data from two pharmaceutical companies.

Authors:  Kenneth R Evans; Terrence Sills; David J DeBrota; Steve Gelwicks; Nina Engelhardt; Darcy Santor
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change.

Authors:  S A Montgomery; M Asberg
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Clinical results for patients with major depressive disorder in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project.

Authors:  Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; M Lynn Crismon; T Michael Kashner; Marcia G Toprac; Thomas J Carmody; Tracie Key; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Bradley Witte; Trisha Suppes; Alexander L Miller; Kenneth Z Altshuler; Steven P Shon
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2004-07

9.  The Hamilton depression scale. Evaluation of objectivity using logistic models.

Authors:  P Bech; P Allerup; L F Gram; N Reisby; R Rosenberg; O Jacobsen; A Nagy
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

Authors:  A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02
View more
  134 in total

1.  DATE: Depressed adolescents treated with exercise: Study rationale and design for a pilot study.

Authors:  Carroll W Hughes; Madhukar H Trivedi; Joseph Cleaver; Tracy L Greer; Graham J Emslie; Beth Kennard; Shauna Dorman; Tyson Bain; Judy Dubreuil; Conrad Barnes
Journal:  Ment Health Phys Act       Date:  2009-12

2.  Concordance between clinician and patient ratings as predictors of response, remission, and recurrence in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Thomas Li; Susan G Kornstein; Edward S Friedman; Anthony J Rothschild; Ron Pedersen; Philip Ninan; Martin Keller; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Assessing anxious features in depressed outpatients.

Authors:  Shawn M McClintock; Mustafa M Husain; Ira H Bernstein; Stephen R Wisniewski; Madhukar H Trivedi; David Morris; Jonathan Alpert; Diane Warden; James F Luther; Susan G Kornstein; Melanie M Biggs; Maurizio Fava; A John Rush
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Sensitivity to changes during antidepressant treatment: a comparison of unidimensional subscales of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 5.  Pharmacogenomics of suicidal events.

Authors:  David Brent; Nadine Melhem; Gustavo Turecki
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  HowNutsAreTheDutch (HoeGekIsNL): A crowdsourcing study of mental symptoms and strengths.

Authors:  Lian Van Der Krieke; Bertus F Jeronimus; Frank J Blaauw; Rob B K Wanders; Ando C Emerencia; Hendrika M Schenk; Stijn De Vos; Evelien Snippe; Marieke Wichers; Johanna T W Wigman; Elisabeth H Bos; Klaas J Wardenaar; Peter De Jonge
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.035

7.  A clinical risk stratification tool for predicting treatment resistance in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Sleep Related Cognitions in Individuals with Symptoms of Insomnia and Depression.

Authors:  Jessica C Levenson; Ruth M Benca; Meredith E Rumble
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Early Improvement in Work Productivity Predicts Future Clinical Course in Depressed Outpatients: Findings From the CO-MED Trial.

Authors:  Manish K Jha; Abu Minhajuddin; Tracy L Greer; Thomas Carmody; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Dyadic discord at baseline is associated with lack of remission in the acute treatment of chronic depression.

Authors:  W H Denton; T J Carmody; A J Rush; M E Thase; M H Trivedi; B A Arnow; D N Klein; M B Keller
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.