Literature DB >> 20537348

Concordance between clinician and patient ratings as predictors of response, remission, and recurrence in major depressive disorder.

Boadie W Dunlop1, Thomas Li, Susan G Kornstein, Edward S Friedman, Anthony J Rothschild, Ron Pedersen, Philip Ninan, Martin Keller, Madhukar H Trivedi.   

Abstract

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Depression With Venlafaxine Extended Release (ER) for Two Years (PREVENT) trial to evaluate whether discrepancies between clinician and patient ratings of depression severity were predictive of response, remission, and recurrence during treatment for a depressive episode. Patients who self-rated depression severity in concordance with the clinician ("concordant patients") were defined as having a standardized patient-rated Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR₃₀) score minus standardized clinician-rated Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D₁₇) score <1 SD from mean. Non-concordant patients ("underrating patients" [-1 SD], "overrating patients" [+1 SD]) were identified. Cohorts were compared for remission and response on the HAM-D₁₇, Clinician Global Impression--Severity (CGI-S), and IDS-SR₃₀ during acute and continuation therapy and time to recurrence during maintenance therapy. During acute treatment female patients were more likely to overrate their depression severity compared to the clinician; older age predicted overrating during continuation treatment. Overrating patients had a slower onset of response on the HAM-D₁₇ during acute treatment (P=0.004). There were no differences between cohorts for remission or response on the HAM-D₁₇ or CGI-S. Overrating patients at week 10 had lower remission and response rates on the IDS-SR₃₀ during continuation therapy (32% and 50%, respectively; P≤0.001) compared with underrating patients (76%, 77%) or concordant patients (64%, 78%). Patient concordance at the end of continuation therapy did not predict recurrence during maintenance therapy, indicating that patient rating scales may be useful in tracking recurrence during maintenance therapy. Poor agreement between patient- and clinician-ratings of depression severity is primarily a state phenomenon, although it is trait-like for some patients. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20537348      PMCID: PMC3677164          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  19 in total

1.  Drug development cost estimates hard to swallow.

Authors:  Roger Collier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Self-report and clinical interview ratings in depression.

Authors:  E S Paykel; B A Prusoff; G L Klerman; A DiMascio
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.254

3.  Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample.

Authors:  Ira H Bernstein; A John Rush; Thomas J Carmody; Ada Woo; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Correlation between patient and clinician assessments of depression severity in the PREVENT study.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Thomas Li; Susan G Kornstein; Edward S Friedman; Anthony J Rothschild; Ron Pedersen; Philip Ninan; Martin Keller
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Comparison of self-rated and clinician-rated measures of depressive symptoms: a naturalistic study.

Authors:  Stella Dorz; Giuseppe Borgherini; Donatella Conforti; Caterina Scarso; Guido Magni
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.915

6.  A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change.

Authors:  S A Montgomery; M Asberg
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  The Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Depression with Venlafaxine for Two Years (PREVENT) Study: Outcomes from the 2-year and combined maintenance phases.

Authors:  Martin B Keller; Madhukar H Trivedi; Michael E Thase; Richard C Shelton; Susan G Kornstein; Charles B Nemeroff; Edward S Friedman; Alan J Gelenberg; James H Kocsis; David L Dunner; Robert M A Hirschfeld; Anthony J Rothschild; James M Ferguson; Alan F Schatzberg; John M Zajecka; Ronald D Pedersen; Bing Yan; Saeeduddin Ahmed; Jeff Musgnung; Philip T Ninan
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression.

Authors:  A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Hicham M Ibrahim; Thomas J Carmody; Bruce Arnow; Daniel N Klein; John C Markowitz; Philip T Ninan; Susan Kornstein; Rachel Manber; Michael E Thase; James H Kocsis; Martin B Keller
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Early symptom change prediction of remission in depression treatment.

Authors:  Martin M Katz; Adam L Meyers; Apurva Prakash; Paula J Gaynor; John P Houston
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2009

10.  Early improvement in the first 2 weeks as a predictor of treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis including 6562 patients.

Authors:  Armin Szegedi; Wim T Jansen; Arjen P P van Willigenburg; Egbert van der Meulen; Hans H Stassen; Michael E Thase
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  16 in total

1.  The fallacy of thresholds used in defining response and remission in depression rating scales.

Authors:  Florian Naudet; Bruno Millet; Jean Michel Reymann; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Changes in mental health outcomes with the intensive in-home child and adolescent psychiatric service: a multi-informant, latent consensus approach.

Authors:  Baptiste Barbot; Johanna Bick; Mary Jane Bentley; Kathleen M B Balestracci; Joseph L Woolston; Jean A Adnopoz; Elena L Grigorenko
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Recovery and subsequent recurrence in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Peter Holland; Weihang Bao; Philip T Ninan; Martin B Keller
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Depression beliefs, treatment preference, and outcomes in a randomized trial for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Mary E Kelley; Tanja C Mletzko; Cristina M Velasquez; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.791

5.  Predicting relapse with individual residual symptoms in major depressive disorder: a reanalysis of the STAR*D data.

Authors:  Hitoshi Sakurai; Takefumi Suzuki; Kimio Yoshimura; Masaru Mimura; Hiroyuki Uchida
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Correlation between patient and clinician assessments of depression severity in the PREVENT study.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Thomas Li; Susan G Kornstein; Edward S Friedman; Anthony J Rothschild; Ron Pedersen; Philip Ninan; Martin Keller
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Baseline difference between patients' and clinicians' rated illness severity scores and subsequent outcomes in major depressive disorder: analysis of the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression data.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tada; Hiroyuki Uchida; Takefumi Suzuki; Takayuki Abe; Bruce G Pollock; Masaru Mimura
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.153

8.  Tailored interventions to implement recommendations for elderly patients with depression in primary care: a study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Eivind Aakhus; Ingeborg Granlund; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Michel Wensing; Andrew D Oxman; Signe A Flottorp
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Concordance between clinician-rated and patient reported outcome measures of depressive symptoms in treatment resistant depression.

Authors:  Rachel Hershenberg; William M McDonald; Andrea Crowell; Patricio Riva-Posse; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg; Boadie W Dunlop
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  A tailored intervention to implement guideline recommendations for elderly patients with depression in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Eivind Aakhus; Ingeborg Granlund; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman; Signe A Flottorp
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.