Literature DB >> 15003433

An Item Response analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using shared data from two pharmaceutical companies.

Kenneth R Evans1, Terrence Sills, David J DeBrota, Steve Gelwicks, Nina Engelhardt, Darcy Santor.   

Abstract

Although the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) remains the most widely used outcome measure in clinical trials of Major Depressive Disorder, the psychometric properties of the individual HAMD items have not been extensively studied. In the present paper, data from four separate clinical trials conducted independently by two pharmaceutical companies were analyzed to determine the relationship between scores on the individual HAMD items and overall depressive severity in an outpatient population. Option characteristic curves (the probability of scoring a particular option in relation to overall HAMD scores) were generated in order to illustrate the relationship between scoring patterns for each item and the range of total HAMD scores. Results showed that Items 1 (Depressed Mood) and 7 (Work and Activities), and to a lesser degree, Items 2 (Guilt), 10 (Anxiety/Psychic), 11 (Anxiety/Somatic), and 13 (Somatic/General) demonstrated a good relationship between item responses and overall depressive severity. However, other items (e.g. Insight, Hypochondriasis) appeared to be more problematic with regard to their ability to discriminate over the full range of depression severity. The present results illustrate that co-operative data sharing between pharmaceutical companies can be a useful tool for improving clinical methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15003433     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2003.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  15 in total

1.  Sensitivity to changes during antidepressant treatment: a comparison of unidimensional subscales of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  An item response analysis of the motor and behavioral subscales of the unified Huntington's disease rating scale in huntington disease gene expansion carriers.

Authors:  Anthony L Vaccarino; Karen Anderson; Beth Borowsky; Kevin Duff; Joseph Giuliano; Mark Guttman; Aileen K Ho; Michael Orth; Jane S Paulsen; Terrence Sills; Daniel P van Kammen; Kenneth R Evans
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 3.  The Depression Inventory Development Workgroup: A Collaborative, Empirically Driven Initiative to Develop a New Assessment Tool for Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Anthony L Vaccarino; Kenneth R Evans; Amir H Kalali; Sidney H Kennedy; Nina Engelhardt; Benicio N Frey; John H Greist; Kenneth A Kobak; Raymond W Lam; Glenda MacQueen; Roumen Milev; Franca M Placenza; Arun V Ravindran; David V Sheehan; Terrence Sills; Janet B W Williams
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-01

4.  THE DEPRESSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT SCALE: Assessment of Psychometric Properties Using Classical and Modern Measurement Theory in a CAN-BIND Trial.

Authors:  Anthony L Vaccarino; Amir H Kalali; Pierre Blier; Susan Gilbert Evans; Nina Engelhardt; Jane A Foster; Benicio N Frey; John H Greist; Kenneth A Kobak; Raymond W Lam; Glenda MacQueen; Roumen Milev; Daniel J Müller; Sagar V Parikh; Franca M Placenza; Sakina J Rizvi; Susan Rotzinger; David V Sheehan; Terrence Sills; Claudio N Soares; Gustavo Turecki; Rudolph Uher; Janet B W Williams; Sidney H Kennedy; Kenneth R Evans
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Measuring depression using item response theory: an examination of three measures of depressive symptomatology.

Authors:  Thomas M Olino; Lan Yu; Daniel N Klein; Paul Rohde; John R Seeley; Paul A Pilkonis; Peter M Lewinsohn
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Symptom features of postpartum depression: are they distinct?

Authors:  Ira H Bernstein; A John Rush; Kimberly Yonkers; Thomas J Carmody; Ada Woo; Kimberly McConnell; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.505

7.  The Inventory Of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C(28)) is more sensitive to changes in depressive symptomatology than the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD(17)) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  An evaluation of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology and the hamilton rating scale for depression: a sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression trial report.

Authors:  A John Rush; Ira H Bernstein; Madhukar H Trivedi; Thomas J Carmody; Stephen Wisniewski; James C Mundt; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Melanie M Biggs; Ada Woo; Andrew A Nierenberg; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Rating depression over brief time intervals with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: standard vs. abbreviated scales.

Authors:  David A Luckenbaugh; Rezvan Ameli; Nancy E Brutsche; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Clinical vs. self-report versions of the quick inventory of depressive symptomatology in a public sector sample.

Authors:  Ira H Bernstein; A John Rush; Thomas J Carmody; Ada Woo; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 4.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.