| Literature DB >> 16191194 |
Suraksha Agrawal1, Faisal Khan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Forensic Short Tandem Repeat (STR) loci are effective for the purpose of individual identification, and other forensic applications. Most of these markers have high allelic variability and mutation rate because of which they have limited use in the phylogenetic reconstruction. In the present study, we have carried out a meta-analysis to explore the possibility of using only five STR loci (TPOX, FES, vWA, F13A and Tho1) to carry out phylogenetic assessment based on the allele frequency profile of 20 world population and north Indian Hindus analyzed in the present study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16191194 PMCID: PMC1266364 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-47
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Population compiled for database of five forensic STR loci
| 1 | Basque | 768 | 627 | 615 | 208 | 859 |
| 2 | Poland | 703 | 643 | 572 | 334 | 488 |
| 3 | Germany | 2876 | 7683 | 13667 | 3438 | 7373 |
| 4 | Italy | 11388 | 4827 | 7135 | 1677 | 4900 |
| 5 | Portugal | 1239 | 2091 | 4720 | 1158 | 4639 |
| 6 | Spain | 1782 | 2325 | 3361 | 1864 | 4037 |
| 7 | Canadian Caucasians | 435 | 321 | 428 | 435 | 435 |
| 8 | Middle Eastern Arabs | 165 | 132 | 149 | 127 | 173 |
| 9 | US Caucasian | 562 | 597 | 759 | 587 | 765 |
| 10 | Slovenia | 235 | 235 | 779 | 236 | 560 |
| 11 | Austria | 153 | 153 | 1946 | 1056 | 1816 |
| 12 | China | 658 | 435 | 1146 | 137 | 2503 |
| 13 | Japan | 1491 | 397 | 1743 | 668 | 2905 |
| 14 | Philippine | 498 | 103 | 376 | 133 | 528 |
| 15 | Taiwan | 716 | 100 | 600 | 149 | 764 |
| 16 | Sharawasi Africans | 59 | 59 | 99 | 59 | 59 |
| 17 | Cameroon | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 |
| 18 | Moroccan Arabs | 127 | 199 | 193 | 75 | 271 |
| 19 | Lisongo Africans | 32 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| 20 | US Afro-Americans | 580 | 679 | 797 | 691 | 793 |
| 21 | North Indian Hindus ** | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 |
* [9]
** Present study
Different statistical analysis done on allele frequency data of five STR loci which are important criterion for a good forensic loci
| 0.06 | |||||
| 0.06 | |||||
| 0.01 | 0.20 | ||||
| 0.28 | 0.40 | ||||
| 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.02 | ||
| 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.40 | ||
| 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.12 | |||
| 0.30 | |||||
| 0.06 | 0.27 | 0.08 | |||
| 0.36 | 0.32 | ||||
| 0.18 | 0.04 | ||||
| 0.02 | 0.02 | ||||
| 0.14 | 0.04 | ||||
| 0.04 | |||||
| 0.34 | |||||
| 0.14 | |||||
| 0.30 | |||||
| 0.02 | |||||
| 0.02 | |||||
| 0.680 | 0.760 | 0.760 | 0.740 | 0.730 | |
| 0.738 | 0.714 | 0.725 | 0.660 | 0.669 | |
| 0.381 | 0.354 | 0.371 | 0.283 | 0.308 | |
Figure 1Phylogenetic reconstruction based on (a) Neighbor-joining (NJ) tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates; (b) Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates and PC plot analysis based on allele frequency differences.