Literature DB >> 16180205

In vitro micronucleus scoring by flow cytometry: differential staining of micronuclei versus apoptotic and necrotic chromatin enhances assay reliability.

Svetlana L Avlasevich1, Steven M Bryce, Siân E Cairns, Stephen D Dertinger.   

Abstract

The in vitro micronucleus test has received considerable attention in recent years for its use in drug safety assessment and toxicological research. The less tedious nature of the assay relative to chromosome aberration analyses is a driving force, and explains why many chemical and drug safety programs have adopted the endpoint. Development of a high-throughput micronucleus scoring system would further enhance the utility of the assay for lead optimization and other early drug development work. Although several variations of a flow cytometric (FCM) method for scoring cell-culture-derived micronuclei (MN) have been described in the literature, they have been unable to distinguish true MN from apoptotic and necrotic chromatin (Nüsse M and Marx K 1997: Mutat Res 392: 109-115). Here, we report advances to this methodology whereby a sequential staining procedure is used to differentially label these types of sub-2n particles. With the use of ethidium monoazide (EMA), the chromatin of dead and dying cells is labeled. After a photoactivation step that covalently binds EMA to chromatin, cytoplasmic membranes are digested and resulting lysates are incubated with RNase plus a pan-nucleic acid dye (SYTOX Green). This process provides a suspension of free nuclei and sub-2n particles that are labeled with either SYTOX or SYTOX and EMA. Preliminary studies with heat-shocked L5178Y mouse cells demonstrated that EMA stains necrotic and mid- through late-stage apoptotic cells. Importantly, the sequential labeling procedure provided reliable micronucleus enumeration, even when cultures contained high percentages of dead cells. Subsequently, experiments with the following diverse genotoxicants were performed: hydroxyurea, methyl methanesulfonate, benzo[a]pyrene, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and vinblastine. Additionally, the nongenotoxicants sucrose, tributyltin methoxide, and dexamethasone were tested up to 5 mg/ml, or to cytotoxic concentrations. FCM data were found to correspond closely with microscopy-based measurements. Collectively, these data suggest that this sequential EMA/SYTOX staining procedure provides reliable, high-throughput enumeration of in vitro MN. 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16180205     DOI: 10.1002/em.20170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  42 in total

Review 1.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Laser scanning cytometry for automation of the micronucleus assay.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Piotr Smolewski; Elena Holden; Ed Luther; Mel Henriksen; Maxime François; Wayne Leifert; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Concentration-response studies of the chromosome-damaging effects of topoisomerase II inhibitors determined in vitro using human TK6 cells.

Authors:  P Gollapudi; V S Bhat; D A Eastmond
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo clastogenic potency based on benchmark dose analysis of flow cytometric micronucleus data.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; John W Wills; Steven M Bryce; Dorothea K Torous; Stephen D Dertinger; Wout Slob
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Automated analysis of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay for radiation biodosimetry using imaging flow cytometry.

Authors:  M A Rodrigues; L A Beaton-Green; B C Kutzner; R C Wilkins
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  In vitro toxicity evaluation of silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles in human SHSY5Y neuronal cells.

Authors:  Gözde Kiliç; Carla Costa; Natalia Fernández-Bertólez; Eduardo Pásaro; João Paulo Teixeira; Blanca Laffon; Vanessa Valdiglesias
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Investigating the Generalizability of the MultiFlow ® DNA Damage Assay and Several Companion Machine Learning Models With a Set of 103 Diverse Test Chemicals.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Kristine L Witt; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  High content flow cytometric micronucleus scoring method is applicable to attachment cell lines.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Jing Shi; John Nicolette; Marilyn Diehl; Paul Sonders; Svetlana Avlasevich; Sarojini Raja; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Predictions of genotoxic potential, mode of action, molecular targets, and potency via a tiered multiflow® assay data analysis strategy.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Andrew R Kraynak; Ryan P Wheeldon; Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Nikki Hall; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sheila M Galloway; Patricia A Escobar; George E Johnson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 10.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.