Literature DB >> 19950402

High content flow cytometric micronucleus scoring method is applicable to attachment cell lines.

Steven M Bryce1, Jing Shi, John Nicolette, Marilyn Diehl, Paul Sonders, Svetlana Avlasevich, Sarojini Raja, Jeffrey C Bemis, Stephen D Dertinger.   

Abstract

A flow cytometric method for analyzing suspension cell cultures for micronucleus content has been previously reported (Avlasevich et al. [2006]: Environ Mol Mutagen 47: 56-66). The experiments described herein were undertaken to evaluate the compatibility of this method (In Vitro MicroFlow) with attachment cells. Initially, CHO-K1 cells were studied in nine independent experiments using mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the cell processing procedure, and also provided historical control data that were useful for setting criteria for making positive calls. Subsequently, CHO-K1 cells were treated with methyl methanesulfonate, mitomycin C, etoposide, vinblastine sulfate, dexamethasone, and sodium chloride. Whereas the four genotoxicants were each observed to increase micronucleus frequencies, the nongenotoxicants induced no such response up to cytotoxic concentrations. Following this initial work, inter-laboratory transferability was evaluated across three sites using a common cell staining and analysis protocol for CHO-K1 or V79 cells that had been treated with the ten chemicals listed in Annex 3 of the OECD Draft Proposal for a New Guideline 487: In Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test. With the exception of benzo[a]pyrene at one site, each laboratory observed increased micronucleus frequencies for the genotoxicants, whereas no significant induction occurred with the non-genotoxicants. Interestingly, the method appeared to distinguish between genotoxic modes of action, as only aneugens increased the average micronucleus fluorescence intensity and the frequency of hypodiploid nuclei. Collectively, these data suggest that flow cytometry is capable of providing reliable micronucleus counts, and that additional information is obtained that appears to discern genotoxic modes of action. Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19950402      PMCID: PMC2841230          DOI: 10.1002/em.20544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  12 in total

1.  Multiparametric flow cytometric analysis of radiation-induced micronuclei in mammalian cell cultures.

Authors:  G A Schreiber; W Beisker; M Bauchinger; M Nüsse
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1992

2.  Chromosome nondisjunction yields tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells in human cell lines.

Authors:  Qinghua Shi; Randall W King
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Further evaluation of a flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus assay in CHO-K1 cells: a reliable platform that detects micronuclei and discriminates apoptotic bodies.

Authors:  Jing Shi; Rahel Bezabhie; Anna Szkudlinska
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Chemical induction of mitotic checkpoint override in mammalian cells results in aneuploidy following a transient tetraploid state.

Authors:  P R Andreassen; S N Martineau; R L Margolis
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  In vitro micronucleus scoring by flow cytometry: differential staining of micronuclei versus apoptotic and necrotic chromatin enhances assay reliability.

Authors:  Svetlana L Avlasevich; Steven M Bryce; Siân E Cairns; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  In vitro micronucleus assay scored by flow cytometry provides a comprehensive evaluation of cytogenetic damage and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Flow cytometric analysis of micronuclei found in cells after irradiation.

Authors:  M Nüsse; J Kramer
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1984-01

8.  Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development.

Authors:  Wilma L Lingle; Susan L Barrett; Vivian C Negron; Antonino B D'Assoro; Kelly Boeneman; Wanguo Liu; Clark M Whitehead; Carol Reynolds; Jeffrey L Salisbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Flow cytometric detection of micronuclei by combined staining of DNA and membranes.

Authors:  J M Wessels; M Nüsse
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1995-03-01

10.  Interlaboratory evaluation of a flow cytometric, high content in vitro micronucleus assay.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Magdalena Lukamowicz; Azeddine Elhajouji; Freddy Van Goethem; Marlies De Boeck; Dominiek Beerens; Hilde Aerts; Jacky Van Gompel; Joanne E Collins; Patricia C Ellis; Angela T White; Anthony M Lynch; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  6 in total

1.  Incorporation of metabolic activation potentiates cyclophosphamide-induced DNA damage response in isogenic DT40 mutant cells.

Authors:  Kiyohiro Hashimoto; Shunichi Takeda; James A Swenberg; Jun Nakamura
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Effect of chemical mutagens and carcinogens on gene expression profiles in human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Lode Godderis; Reuben Thomas; Alan E Hubbard; Ali M Tabish; Peter Hoet; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Hendrik Veulemans; Cliona M McHale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Critical review of the current and future challenges associated with advanced in vitro systems towards the study of nanoparticle (secondary) genotoxicity.

Authors:  Stephen J Evans; Martin J D Clift; Neenu Singh; Jefferson de Oliveira Mallia; Michael Burgum; John W Wills; Thomas S Wilkinson; Gareth J S Jenkins; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Cytotoxicity, Genotoxicity and Disturbance of Cell Cycle in HepG2 Cells Exposed to OTA and BEA: Single and Combined Actions.

Authors:  Ana Juan-García; Josefa Tolosa; Cristina Juan; María-José Ruiz
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Profiling dose-dependent activation of p53-mediated signaling pathways by chemicals with distinct mechanisms of DNA damage.

Authors:  Rebecca A Clewell; Bin Sun; Yeyejide Adeleye; Paul Carmichael; Alina Efremenko; Patrick D McMullen; Salil Pendse; O J Trask; Andy White; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Evaluation of the automated MicroFlow® and Metafer™ platforms for high-throughput micronucleus scoring and dose response analysis in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Jatin R Verma; Benjamin J Rees; Eleanor C Wilde; Catherine A Thornton; Gareth J S Jenkins; Shareen H Doak; George E Johnson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 6.168

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.