PURPOSE: Linezolid is an option for the treatment of infections caused by multiresistant Gram-positive bacteria. The survival of critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) can be improved by increasing the dose of renal replacement therapy. Extended (daily) dialysis (ED) is a new and important approach to renal replacement therapy in intensive care units. The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in septic patients without ED and on ED, respectively. METHODS: We studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in adult intensive care patients with sepsis (n = 5) and anuric septic patients with ARF being treated with ED (n = 10). Linezolid 600 mg was administered intravenously twice daily. The pharmacokinetic parameters, their variability, and possible covariates were analyzed using NONMEM. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid followed a two-compartment model with clearance (Cl) = 0.159 L h(-1) kg(-1) +/- 51% (population mean +/- interindividual variability), central volume of distribution (V(1)) = 0.273 L/kg +/- 21%, intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 0.369 L h(-1) kg(-1), and peripheral volume of distribution (V(2)) = 0.271 L/kg. The clearance in ED patients while on dialysis was increased by 3.5 L/h, and patients with liver transplantation/resection had their clearance reduced by 60%. Intra-individual variability was much smaller than inter-individual variability. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that linezolid pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with ARF undergoing ED is not comparable to that in healthy subjects and patients without ARF. The best method of managing linezolid dosage in such a complex group of patients, whose physiology can vary daily, would be to use therapeutic drug monitoring.
PURPOSE:Linezolid is an option for the treatment of infections caused by multiresistant Gram-positive bacteria. The survival of critically illpatients with acute renal failure (ARF) can be improved by increasing the dose of renal replacement therapy. Extended (daily) dialysis (ED) is a new and important approach to renal replacement therapy in intensive care units. The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in septic patients without ED and on ED, respectively. METHODS: We studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in adult intensive care patients with sepsis (n = 5) and anuric septicpatients with ARF being treated with ED (n = 10). Linezolid 600 mg was administered intravenously twice daily. The pharmacokinetic parameters, their variability, and possible covariates were analyzed using NONMEM. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of linezolid followed a two-compartment model with clearance (Cl) = 0.159 L h(-1) kg(-1) +/- 51% (population mean +/- interindividual variability), central volume of distribution (V(1)) = 0.273 L/kg +/- 21%, intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 0.369 L h(-1) kg(-1), and peripheral volume of distribution (V(2)) = 0.271 L/kg. The clearance in EDpatients while on dialysis was increased by 3.5 L/h, and patients with liver transplantation/resection had their clearance reduced by 60%. Intra-individual variability was much smaller than inter-individual variability. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that linezolid pharmacokinetics in critically illpatients with ARF undergoing ED is not comparable to that in healthy subjects and patients without ARF. The best method of managing linezolid dosage in such a complex group of patients, whose physiology can vary daily, would be to use therapeutic drug monitoring.
Authors: Stefanie Swoboda; Stefan Fritz; Marcus E Martignoni; Rita A Feldhues; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Markus W Buchler; Heinrich K Geiss Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2005-09-05 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Brigitte Meyer; Gabriela V Kornek; Mariam Nikfardjam; Georg Delle Karth; Gottfried Heinz; Gottfried J Locker; Walter Jaeger; Florian Thalhammer Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2005-05-19 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Michael D Kraft; Deborah A Pasko; Daryl D DePestel; Jessica J Ellis; Charles A Peloquin; Bruce A Mueller Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Rebecca A Keel; Andre Schaeftlein; Charlotte Kloft; J Samuel Pope; R Frederic Knauft; Marianne Muhlebach; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Max Taubert; Michael Zoller; Barbara Maier; Sebastian Frechen; Christina Scharf; Lesca-Miriam Holdt; Lorenz Frey; Michael Vogeser; Uwe Fuhr; Johannes Zander Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Iris K Minichmayr; André Schaeftlein; Joseph L Kuti; Markus Zeitlinger; Charlotte Kloft Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 6.447