Literature DB >> 28631121

[Prudent use of antimicrobial prophylaxis : Prevention of increasing antibiotic resistance].

C Hein1, A Pilatz1, F M E Wagenlehner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis during urological procedures to prevent postoperative complications is very common.
OBJECTIVES: What kind of recommendations for reasonable use of peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis during urological procedures to prevent increasing antibiotic resistance and postoperative complications exist?
METHODS: Review of evidence-based recommendations from literature and current Guidelines of the EAU.
RESULTS: For urological procedures there are evidenced-based recommendations for using antimicrobial prophylaxis, although the evidence is not always sufficiently high. For endourological procedures it is recommended to use Cephalosporines group 2 (or 3), Aminopenicillin/Beta-lactamase inhibitor or Cotrimoxazole. For transrectal core biopsy of the prostate, depending on the risk, Fluoroquinolones, Cotrimoxazole or targeted prophylaxis are recommended. For laparoscopic or open procedures, partly optional, Cephalosporines group 2 (or 3), Aminopenicillin/Beta-lactamase inhibitor or Cotrimoxazole and for a cystectomy with opening of the intestinal tract Cephalosporines group 2 or an Aminopenicillin/Beta-lactamase inhibitor, together with Metronidazole are recommended.
CONCLUSIONS: Using prudent peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis patient surgical risk factors as well as the expected spectrum of pathogens and the local resistance profile should be considered. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the one hand aims at preventing postoperative infections, and on the other hand plays an important role in the total antibiotic consumption. It is therefore a pivotal aspect of "Antimicrobial Stewardship" strategies in the health-care system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shock wave lithotripsy, extracorporeal; Spectrum of pathogens; Ureterorenoscopy; Urinary tract infections; “Antimicrobial Stewardship”

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28631121     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0433-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  21 in total

1.  Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in core prostate biopsy: Impact of timing and identification of risk factors.

Authors:  Sandra Lindstedt; Ulla Lindström; Eva Ljunggren; Björn Wullt; Magnus Grabe
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-08

Review 3.  Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Prospective, randomized, multicentric, open, comparative study on the efficacy of a prophylactic single dose of 500 mg levofloxacin versus 1920 mg trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole versus a control group in patients undergoing TUR of the prostate.

Authors:  F M E Wagenlehner; C Wagenlehner; S Schinzel; K G Naber
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Prophylactic antibiotic use in transurethral prostatic resection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Berry; Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Paramananthan Mariappan; Gordon Smith; Simon V Bariol; Sami A Moussa; David A Tolley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Risk factors for prediction of surgical site infections in "clean surgery".

Authors:  Patrick Pessaux; David Atallah; Emilie Lermite; Simon Msika; Jean-Marie Hay; Yves Flamant; Jean-Pierre Arnaud
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Increasing prostate biopsy cores based on volume vs the sextant biopsy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study on cancer detection rates and morbidity.

Authors:  Paramananthan Mariappan; Wooi Loong Chong; Murali Sundram; Sahabudin R Mohamed
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: science for intervention.

Authors:  I Roca; M Akova; F Baquero; J Carlet; M Cavaleri; S Coenen; J Cohen; D Findlay; I Gyssens; O E Heuer; G Kahlmeter; H Kruse; R Laxminarayan; E Liébana; L López-Cerero; A MacGowan; M Martins; J Rodríguez-Baño; J-M Rolain; C Segovia; B Sigauque; E Tacconelli; E Wellington; J Vila
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2015-04-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  [Antibiotic prophylaxis for endourological interventions considering antibiotic stewardship].

Authors:  Jennifer Kranz; Laila Schneidewind; Adrian Pilatz; Flo Ri An Wagenlehner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Preliminary trial of 24 vs 72 hour perioperative meropenem in patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bacteriuria scheduled for urological procedures.

Authors:  Marcin Radko; Aneta Guzek; Tomasz Syryło; Zbigniew Rybicki; Henryk Zieliński
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2022-06-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.