Literature DB >> 16172502

The genetic architecture of sucrose responsiveness in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.).

Olav Rueppell1, Sathees B C Chandra, Tanya Pankiw, M Kim Fondrk, Martin Beye, Greg Hunt, Robert E Page.   

Abstract

One of the best examples of a natural behavioral syndrome is the pollen-hoarding syndrome in honeybees that ties together multiple behavioral phenotypes, ranging from foraging behavior to behavioral ontogeny and learning performance. A central behavioral factor is the bees' responsiveness to sucrose, measured as their proboscis extension reflex. This study examines the genetics of this trait in diploid worker and haploid male honeybees (drones) to learn more about the genetic architecture of the overall behavioral syndrome, using original strains selected for pollen-hoarding behavior. We show that a significant proportion of the phenotypic variability is determined by genotype in males and workers. Second, our data present overwhelming evidence for pleiotropic effects of previously identified quantitative trait loci for foraging behavior (pln-QTL) and epistatic interactions among them. Furthermore, we report on three genomic QTL scans (two reciprocal worker backcrosses and one drone hybrid population) derived from our selection strains. We present at least one significant and two putative new QTL directly affecting the sucrose response of honeybees. Thus, this study demonstrates the modular genetic architecture of behavioral syndromes in general, and elucidates the genetic architecture of the pollen-hoarding behavioral syndrome in particular. Understanding this behavioral syndrome is important for understanding the division of labor in social insects and social evolution itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16172502      PMCID: PMC1456151          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.046490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  42 in total

Review 1.  From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research?

Authors:  S D Gosling
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  T Rhen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Genetic modules and networks for behavior: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  Robert R H Anholt
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page; J Erber; M K Fondrk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Responsiveness to sucrose affects tactile and olfactory learning in preforaging honey bees of two genetic strains.

Authors:  R Scheiner; R E Page; J Erber
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-04-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Pleiotropy, epistasis and new QTL: the genetic architecture of honey bee foraging behavior.

Authors:  O Rüppell; T Pankiw; R E Page
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Octopamine modulates responsiveness to foraging-related stimuli in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  A B Barron; D J Schulz; G E Robinson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  PKA and PKC content in the honey bee central brain differs in genotypic strains with distinct foraging behavior.

Authors:  M A Humphries; U Müller; M K Fondrk; R E Page
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  25 in total

1.  Pleiotropy of segregating genetic variants that affect honey bee worker life expectancy.

Authors:  Luke R Dixon; Michelle R McQuage; Ellen J Lonon; Dominique Buehler; Oumar Seck; Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Regulation of behaviorally associated gene networks in worker honey bee ovaries.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Sarah D Kocher; Timothy A Linksvayer; Christina M Grozinger; Robert E Page; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Genetic architecture of ovary size and asymmetry in European honeybee workers.

Authors:  O Rueppell; J D Metheny; T Linksvayer; M K Fondrk; R E Page; G V Amdam
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Age, worksite location, neuromodulators, and task performance in the ant Pheidole dentata.

Authors:  Ysabel Milton Giraldo; Adina Rusakov; Alexandria Diloreto; Adrianna Kordek; James F A Traniello
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Be meek or be bold? A colony-level behavioural syndrome in ants.

Authors:  S E Bengston; A Dornhaus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Diverse tastes: Genetics of sweet and bitter perception.

Authors:  Danielle R Reed; Toshiko Tanaka; Amanda H McDaniel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-06-19

7.  Complex pleiotropy characterizes the pollen hoarding syndrome in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Robert E Page; M Kim Fondrk; Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  An alarm pheromone modulates appetitive olfactory learning in the honeybee (apis mellifera).

Authors:  Elodie Urlacher; Bernard Francés; Martin Giurfa; Jean-Marc Devaud
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 9.  Insights into the molecular basis of social behaviour from studies on the honeybee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Rachel Denison; Valérie Raymond-Delpech
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-15

10.  The effects of young brood on the foraging behavior of two strains of honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Jennifer M Tsuruda; Robert E Page
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.