Literature DB >> 16172291

More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery.

Marc L Melcher1, Jonathan T Carter, Andrew Posselt, Quan-Yang Duh, Marshall Stoller, Chris E Freise, Sang-Mo Kang.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Concern exists as to the safety of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) compared with open donor nephrectomy. Reported complications of LDN include emergent conversion to an open procedure, repeated surgery for postoperative bleeding, and even death. We hypothesize that LDNs can be performed safely, with a complication rate comparable with that of open donor nephrectomies.
DESIGN: Case series and review of the literature.
SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Five hundred thirty kidney donors. INTERVENTION: An LDN performed without hand assistance, with the kidney extracted through a low transverse incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean operative time, requirement for transfusion, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: This series includes 84 right-sided donor nephrectomies, 86 donors with a body mass index greater than 30 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), and 91 donors with complex vascular anatomy. Mean donor age was 40 years (range, 18-73 years), and mean +/- SD operative time was 196 +/- 43 minutes. The only conversion occurred early in the series, and there have been 525 subsequent cases without the need for conversion or repeated surgery. There were no donor deaths. Five donors (0.9%) required perioperative blood transfusions. Overall complication rate was 6.4%, including 14 minor wound infections, 2 bowel injuries, 1 case of prolonged ileus, 3 splenic injuries, 2 bladder infections, 1 bladder injury, 1 case of rhabdomyolysis, 1 case of pneumonia, and 2 thromboembolic events.
CONCLUSION: This series demonstrates that LDN can be performed at least as safely as open donor nephrectomy, with minimal bleeding and few postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16172291     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.9.835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  16 in total

1.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  [Ten years of laparoscopic living kidney donation. From an extravagant to a routine procedure].

Authors:  M Giessing; T F Fuller; S Deger; J Roigas; M Tüllmann; L Liefeldt; K Budde; T Fischer; B Winkelmann; D Schnorr; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Cumulative sum analysis of the learning curve for video-assisted minilaparotomy donor nephrectomy in healthy kidney donors.

Authors:  Jee Soo Park; Hyun Kyu Ahn; Joonchae Na; Hyung Ho Lee; Young Eun Yoon; Min Gee Yoon; Woong Kyu Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  No need for systemic heparinization during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with short warm ischemia time.

Authors:  Frank Friedersdorff; Ingmar Wolff; Serdar Deger; Jan Roigas; John Buckendahl; Hannes Cash; Markus Giessing; Lutz Liefeldt; Kurt Miller; Tom Florian Fuller; T Florian Fuller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy: current state of the art.

Authors:  Nicole M Shockcor; Sam Sultan; Josue Alvarez-Casas; Philip S Brazio; Michael Phelan; John C LaMattina; Rolf N Barth
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Central venous pressure monitoring in living donor kidney recipients does not affect immediate graft function: A propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Dieter Adelmann; Leonie Bicknell; Claus U Niemann; John Feiner; Garrett R Roll; Lyle Burdine; Elizabeth L Whitlock
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  [Pararectal mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation].

Authors:  A A Schnitzbauer; M Loss; M Hornung; S Farkas; B Krämer; W Wieland; H J Schlitt; A Obed
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Donor complications following laparoscopic compared to hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Whitney R Halgrimson; Jeffrey Campsen; M Susan Mandell; Mara A Kelly; Igal Kam; Michael A Zimmerman
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-01-06

9.  Effect of robotic assistance on the "learning curve" for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  S Horgan; C Galvani; M V Gorodner; G R Jacobsen; F Moser; A Manzelli; J Oberholzer; M P Fisichella; D Bogetti; G Testa; H N Sankary; E Benedetti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy for right kidneys: Experience in a German community hospital.

Authors:  S Saad; A Paul; J Treckmann; M Nagelschmidt; M Heiss; W Arns
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.