Literature DB >> 21607574

No need for systemic heparinization during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with short warm ischemia time.

Frank Friedersdorff1, Ingmar Wolff, Serdar Deger, Jan Roigas, John Buckendahl, Hannes Cash, Markus Giessing, Lutz Liefeldt, Kurt Miller, Tom Florian Fuller, T Florian Fuller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Systemic heparin administration during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) may prevent microvascular thrombus formation following warm ischemia. We herein present our experience with and without systemic heparinization during LDN.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed donor complications and graft outcomes in 119 consecutive live donor kidney transplantations between January 2005 and December 2009. Systemic heparin was administered to the first 65 donors. LDN was carried out by 2 surgeons using a pure laparoscopic technique.
RESULTS: Total operating time for LDN was significantly longer in the heparin group (202 vs. 157 min). The incidence of renal artery multiplicity was significantly higher in the heparin group. Mean warm ischemia time was 160 s, and mean hospital stay was 5 days with no differences between groups. Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 3 donors with systemic heparinization and in 1 without heparinization. Two donors received blood transfusions, and 2 underwent laparoscopic reexploration. Three grafts were lost in the heparin group and 1 in the non-heparin group. Graft loss was due to early vascular thrombosis (n = 3) and due to acute rejection (n = 1). Overall, 1-year graft survival was 96.6%, and 1-year serum creatinine was 1.41 mg/dl (P = n. s. between groups).
CONCLUSIONS: Abandoning systemic donor heparinization in LDN with short warm ischemia has a low complication rate without adverse effects on short- and long-term graft outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21607574     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0704-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  23 in total

1.  More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery.

Authors:  Marc L Melcher; Jonathan T Carter; Andrew Posselt; Quan-Yang Duh; Marshall Stoller; Chris E Freise; Sang-Mo Kang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-09

2.  Effect of warm ischemia on graft outcome in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  N Simforoosh; A Basiri; N Shakhssalim; S A M Ziaee; A Tabibi; S M M Hosseini Moghaddam
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Ithaar H Derweesh; David A Goldfarb; Sidney C Abreu; Mahesh Goel; Stuart M Flechner; Charles Modlin; Lingmei Zhou; Stevan B Streem; Andrew C Novick; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: a new technique with preservation of vascular length.

Authors:  Ingolf A Turk; Serdar Deger; John W Davis; Markus Giesing; Michael D Fabrizio; Bernd Schönberger; Gerald H Jordan; Stefan A Loening
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy without intraoperative systemic heparinization.

Authors:  Elaine Y Cheng; David B Leeser; Sandip Kapur; Joseph Del Pizzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Experience with 750 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies--is it time to use a standardized classification of complications?

Authors:  J D Harper; A Breda; J T Leppert; J L Veale; H A Gritsch; P G Schulam
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a look at current trends and practice patterns at major transplant centers across the United States.

Authors:  Andrew D Wright; Thomas A Will; David R Holt; Thomas M T Turk; Kent T Perry
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Use of heparin and protamine sulfate during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Kent T Perry; Amnon Zisman; H Albin Gritsch; Allan Pantuck; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Importance of minimizing HLA-DR mismatch and cold preservation time in cadaveric renal transplantation.

Authors:  J K Connolly; P A Dyer; S Martin; N R Parrott; R C Pearson; R W Johnson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry.

Authors:  Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Systemic heparinisation in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Charlotte Crotty; Yasmin Tabbakh; Sarah A Hosgood; Michael L Nicholson
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2013-12-16

2.  Aggravation of fibrin deposition and microthrombus formation within the graft during kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Tamar A J van den Berg; Marius C van den Heuvel; Janneke Wiersema-Buist; Jelle Adelmeijer; Gertrude J Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke; Ton Lisman; Stephan J L Bakker; Harry van Goor; Robert A Pol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Differences Between the Right and Left Side Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Single-Center Outcomes.

Authors:  Kadir Omur Gunseren; Mehmet Cagatay Cicek; Yavuz Mert Aydin; Cagdas Gokhun Ozmerdiven; Ismet Yavascaoglu
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-09-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.