Literature DB >> 16767454

[Pararectal mini-incision for strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy in living kidney donation].

A A Schnitzbauer1, M Loss, M Hornung, S Farkas, B Krämer, W Wieland, H J Schlitt, A Obed.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study we present the technique of a strictly retroperitoneal donor nephrectomy via a pararectal mini-incision.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of 34 living kidney donations were analyzed. All donors underwent a pararectal mini-incision and strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy (MIDN).
RESULTS: Total operation time, perioperative use of pain medication, length of hospital stay after successful mobilization, and return to full enteral nutrition and regular digestion were evaluated retrospectively. Total operation time for MIDN was 132+/-26 min. The total average application was 22.2+/-19.4 mg of opioid in morphine equivalent dosage (MED), 7.7+/-6.1 g metamizol, and 512+/-325 mg NSAR during hospital stay, which was 4.9+/-1.4 days. Patients were mobilized primarily 2.9+/-8.0 h after surgery. Mobility was achieved 33.8+/-15.8 h after surgery. Enteral nutrition with fluids was started after 1.9+/-7.0 h, full enteral nutrition was accomplished after 37.4+/-19.0 h, and normal digestion returned 58.6+/-23.0 h after the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The strictly retroperitoneal nephrectomy via a mini-incision is an elegant, minimally traumatic, safe, and quickly learnable method, resulting in short hospital stays, good cosmetic results, and a low grade of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16767454     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-006-1080-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  21 in total

1.  Living donor nephrectomy in an open technique; a long-term analysis of donor outcome.

Authors:  M Schostak; H Wloch; M Müller; M Schrader; F Christoph; G Offermann; K Miller
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision.

Authors:  Michael Neipp; Steffan Jackobs; Thomas Becker; Andreas Meyer zu Vilsendorf; Markus Winny; Rainer Lueck; Juergen Klempnauer; Björn Nashan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Renal transplantation is well established as the preferred form of replacement therapy for most patients with endstage renal disease.

Authors:  A C Novick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Living renal transplantation--the Oslo experience.

Authors:  A Jakobsen
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: experience from the first 75 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jonas Wadström
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery.

Authors:  Marc L Melcher; Jonathan T Carter; Andrew Posselt; Quan-Yang Duh; Marshall Stoller; Chris E Freise; Sang-Mo Kang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-09

7.  A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  G R R Lewis; N R Brook; J R Waller; J C Bains; P S Veitch; M L Nicholson
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  [Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results].

Authors:  M Giessing; S Deger; V Ebeling; J Roigas; I Türk; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Urological and surgical complications in 362 consecutive living related donor kidney transplantations.

Authors:  Taner Koçak; Ismet Nane; Haluk Ander; Orhan Ziylan; Tayfun Oktar; Cavit Ozsoy
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns.

Authors:  K W Kercher; B T Heniford; B D Matthews; T I Smith; A E Lincourt; D H Hayes; L B Eskind; P B Irby; C M Teigland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.