Literature DB >> 29703043

Cumulative sum analysis of the learning curve for video-assisted minilaparotomy donor nephrectomy in healthy kidney donors.

Jee Soo Park1, Hyun Kyu Ahn1, Joonchae Na1, Hyung Ho Lee2, Young Eun Yoon3, Min Gee Yoon1, Woong Kyu Han1,4.   

Abstract

Video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery (VAMS) is a hybrid of open and laparoscopic surgical techniques, so has advantages of both approaches. Here, we examined the learning curve for this procedure.We retrospectively evaluated 50 consecutive patients who underwent VAMS donor nephrectomy performed by a single surgeon (YEY) between March 2015 and March 2016. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. Measures of surgical performance included total operation time, warm ischemic time, and estimated blood loss.The mean patient age, body mass index, and body surface area were 43.5 years, 23.8 kg/m, and 1.7 m, respectively. The mean operation time and warm ischemic time were 160.0 minutes and 124.4 seconds. The learning curve of total operation time was best modeled as a second-order polynomial with equation CUSUMOT (minutes) = -0.3802 × case number + 20.315 × case number - 41.333 (R = 0.7707). The curve included 3 unique phases: phase 1 (the initial 17 cases), which is the initial learning curve; phase 2 (the middle 23 cases), expert competence, and phase 3 (the subsequent cases), mastery. In terms of warm ischemic time and estimated blood loss, the initial learning was achieved after 16 cases and after 9 to 10 cases, one could achieve competency.The VAMS donor nephrectomy learning curve is shorter than for laparoscopic or robotic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy. Surgeons can become familiar with the procedure and perform it without complications after approximately 16 to 17 operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29703043      PMCID: PMC5944565          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


  27 in total

1.  Hand-assisted laparoscopy: con.

Authors:  I S Gill
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry: multistep regression models on kidney graft survival.

Authors:  Y W Cho; J M Cecka; D W Gjertson; P I Terasaki
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1990

3.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: short learning curve.

Authors:  R Dalla Valle; M P Mazzoni; E Capocasale; N Busi; A Pietrabissa; C Moretto; M Gualtierotti; M Massa; F Mosca; M Sianesi
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Quality of life comparison between open and retroperitoneal video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery for kidney donors.

Authors:  W K Han; H Y Lee; H G Jeon; D J Joo; K H Rha; S C Yang
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery.

Authors:  Marc L Melcher; Jonathan T Carter; Andrew Posselt; Quan-Yang Duh; Marshall Stoller; Chris E Freise; Sang-Mo Kang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-09

6.  The cusum plot: its utility in the analysis of clinical data.

Authors:  H Wohl
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted urologic surgery through minilaparotomy.

Authors:  Y J Byun; S C Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the conventional open approach.

Authors:  S L Brown; T R Biehl; M C Rawlins; T R Hefty
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival.

Authors:  Christoph Troppmann; Debra B Ormond; Richard V Perez
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Effect of robotic assistance on the "learning curve" for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  S Horgan; C Galvani; M V Gorodner; G R Jacobsen; F Moser; A Manzelli; J Oberholzer; M P Fisichella; D Bogetti; G Testa; H N Sankary; E Benedetti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quality Improvement of Damage Control Laparotomy: Impact of the Establishment of a Single Korean Regional Trauma Center.

Authors:  Wu Seong Kang; Young Goun Jo; Yun Chul Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Learning Curve Analysis of Single-Site Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Yeon Jee Lee; Dong-Eun Lee; Jaekyung Bae; Hyeong In Ha; Myong Cheol Lim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.